SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Kanodia Technoplast Limited – Appellant
Versus
A.P. Trading Company – Respondent


JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 11 (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of Arbitrator for adjudication of disputes with the respondent.

2. Petitioner-company, registered under the Companies Act, 1956, claims to be engaged in the business of making laminated pouches for mouth freshners, tobacco, pan masala and other food items. It claims to have come into business with respondent, a sole proprietorship firm, in April, 2017 for supply of paper.

3. According to petitioner, on 18.09.2019, respondent filed an application before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the petitioner and claimed an amount of Rs.8,56,07,464/- in default. Upon being served with the notice of the said application, petitioner on 14.11.2019 filed its reply before the NCLT challenging the claims raised by the respondent herein. Further claimed by petitioner that during pendency of those proceedings, respondent approached the petitioner to amicably resolve the matter and parties entered into a Memorandum of Understanding dated 02.03.2020, wherein schedule for

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top