Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Ashok Bhardwaj – Appellant
Versus
Dinkar Bhardwaj – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through video conferencing.
2. These matters pertain to the Shri Kalkaji Mandir, which this Court has been hearing from time to time. These are part heard matters.
CS (OS) 552/2021 & I.As. 16148-49/2021
3. In this matter, Mr. Avinash Chaurasiya, ld. Counsel for the Defendant, submits that Defendant No.15-Mr. Dinesh Bhardwaj, who succeeded in the auction conducted on 4th October, 2019 for the Bari to conduct puja amongst members of Thulla Bahadur has not deposited the share of Defendant No.54 - Mr. Naveen Bhardwaj.
4. Accordingly, issue notice to Mr. Lokesh Bhardwaj (Mob. No.9971576388), ld. Counsel and to Defendant No.15 - Mr. Dinesh Bhardwaj (Mob. No.9717252688 & 9818760009). Mr. Dinesh Bhardwaj shall join the proceedings on the next date of hearing and explain as to why the share of Defendant No.54 has not been deposited.
5. Mr. Kush Bhardwaj, ld. Counsel, submits that an FDR of Rs.4,22,500/- bearing no.488944 dated 7th October, 2019, is lying deposited with the trial court. Registry to put up a report in this regard after ascertaining from the concerned Nazir.
6. List on 7th March, 2022.
7. On the said
The main legal point established in the judgment is that suits seeking relief for periods that had already expired were rendered infructuous, leading to the disposal of the suits and pending applicat....
The court affirmed that female heirs have equal rights to perform rituals and manage offerings in religious spaces, countering male domination in such practices.
Point of Law : Respondent seems to have monopolised bari and related rights, and is also not giving any proper accounts qua said bari - Court Receivers for the period said two Receivers are permitted....
The court ruled that rights to temple offerings must be resolved before any applications regarding their allocation can be granted.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to transfer matters under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, the dismissal of suits due to lack of appearance by t....
The court affirmed its jurisdiction to comprehensively address management issues of a religious institution, emphasizing necessary actions against unauthorized occupants and ensuring compliance with ....
Court emphasized coordinated judicial oversight for effective management of public places of worship, highlighting cleanliness and accountability amidst multiple ongoing litigations.
Eviction of unauthorized occupants from temple premises is upheld while ensuring rehabilitation under specific schemes, and rights of female heirs to offerings and puja sewa require future adjudicati....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the authority of the court to direct eviction and provide rehabilitation options for unauthorized occupants, emphasizing the need for expedited imp....
The main legal point established is the need for effective orders to address the unsatisfactory condition of the temple, the delay in adjudication due to multiple pending cases, and the requirement f....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
