Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Neeta Bhardwaj – Appellant
Versus
Kamlesh Sharma – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court has authority over kalkaji mandir cases. (Para 2 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. unauthorized encroachments must be vacated. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. shopkeepers can seek alternate accommodations. (Para 11 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. drinking water supply to be ensured. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. suits concerning kalkaji mandir are consolidated. (Para 21 , 23 , 24) |
| 6. review application procedures outlined. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 7. court to assess historical orders and jurisdiction. (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 8. administrator appointed amid management concerns. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 9. review application dismissed without merit. (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done in physical Court. Hybrid mode is permitted in cases where permission is being sought from the Court.
2. These matters pertain to the Kalkaji Mandir, which this Court has been hearing from time to time. These are part heard matters.
3. Vide last order dated 15th November 2021, various directions were issued to the Delhi Police, SDMC, the ld. Administrator appointed by this Court, DUSIB, Delhi Jal Board as well as some of the baridaars.
Mi
The court affirmed its jurisdiction to comprehensively address management issues of a religious institution, emphasizing necessary actions against unauthorized occupants and ensuring compliance with ....
There is enormous in-fighting amongst the stakeholders which is reflected in various proceedings that were pending in different courts.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to issue directions for the regulation and management of religious premises, removal of unauthorized encroachments, and pr....
Unauthorized encroachment on temple premises is impermissible, mandating removal and establishment of safety measures for public devotees.
Court emphasized the authority of the Administrator in managing religious premises, focusing on the removal of unauthorized occupants and the proper structuring of redevelopment plans.
The court mandates the appointment of an Independent Administrator for effective management and redevelopment of a temple amidst ongoing disputes and critical hygiene issues affecting devotees.
Court emphasized coordinated judicial oversight for effective management of public places of worship, highlighting cleanliness and accountability amidst multiple ongoing litigations.
The main legal point established is the need for effective orders to address the unsatisfactory condition of the temple, the delay in adjudication due to multiple pending cases, and the requirement f....
The High Court may consolidate and adjudicate multiple related cases under Article 227 to improve judicial efficiency, particularly in complex temple management disputes.
Timely vacating of premises for re-development is crucial to facilitate the cleaning and re-development of the Mandir premises.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
