Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Neeta Bhardwaj – Appellant
Versus
Kamlesh Sharma – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural clarity for the trial court (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. challenges against trial court's order regarding worship rights (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. distribution of offerings in kalkaji mandir (Para 10 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. inspection and redevelopment of temple premises (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. court scheduling for further hearings (Para 25 , 26) |
ORDER
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. These matters relate to the Shri Kalkaji Mandir and are being heard from time to time. Vide order dated 16th July 2021, notices were issued to counsels appearing in the trial courts where more than 40 cases are pending in respect of the Kalkaji Mandir. In view of the said notice, Suit CS No.29016/2016 has been mentioned today. It is submitted that evidence has been concluded before the ld. ADJ and it may be clarified that the ld. ADJ can proceed to adjudicate the matter finally. It is clarified that since the suit is listed for final arguments before the ADJ, the said matter may proceed further.
CM (M) 575/2021 & CM APPLs.29013-14/2021
3. The present petition challenges the impugned order dated 30th September, 2020, passed by the ADJ-II, West District, Ti
The court ruled that rights to temple offerings must be resolved before any applications regarding their allocation can be granted.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that suits seeking relief for periods that had already expired were rendered infructuous, leading to the disposal of the suits and pending applicat....
Point of Law : Respondent seems to have monopolised bari and related rights, and is also not giving any proper accounts qua said bari - Court Receivers for the period said two Receivers are permitted....
The court affirmed that female heirs have equal rights to perform rituals and manage offerings in religious spaces, countering male domination in such practices.
The court affirmed its jurisdiction to comprehensively address management issues of a religious institution, emphasizing necessary actions against unauthorized occupants and ensuring compliance with ....
There is enormous in-fighting amongst the stakeholders which is reflected in various proceedings that were pending in different courts.
Court emphasized coordinated judicial oversight for effective management of public places of worship, highlighting cleanliness and accountability amidst multiple ongoing litigations.
The main legal point established is the need for effective orders to address the unsatisfactory condition of the temple, the delay in adjudication due to multiple pending cases, and the requirement f....
The High Court may consolidate and adjudicate multiple related cases under Article 227 to improve judicial efficiency, particularly in complex temple management disputes.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to transfer matters under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, the dismissal of suits due to lack of appearance by t....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
