SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Incred Financial Services Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Shree Kamakshi Motors – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks arbitration for loan disputes. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. parties agree on arbitration being appropriate. (Para 5 , 6)
3. court appoints arbitrator and sets process. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
4. petition is disposed in favor of arbitration. (Para 11)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 11 (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of Arbitrator for adjudication of disputes with respondents.

2. Petitioner-M/s InCred Financial Services Ltd. claims to be is providing various type of finance facility to its numerous customer/borrower. Petitioner claims that in the course of business, respondent No.1 through respondents No.2 & 3 approached the petitioner for obtaining Working Capital Channel Finance of Rs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore only) and Working Capital Term Loan of Rs.50,00,000/- (Rupees Fifty Lacs only) and relying on the requests of the respondents, the petitioner vide letter dated 30.04.2018 sanctioned total limit of Rs.1,00,00,000/-. In addition, extension of Working Capital Finance of Rs.1,00,00,000/- was executed through Addendum Sanction by Petitioner for the sum o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top