Manika Batra vs Table Tennis Federation of India

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
REKHA PALLI
Manika Batra – Appellant
Versus
Table Tennis Federation of India – Respondent

Table of Content
1. petition filed by top-ranked athlete regarding illegal rules. (Para 1)
2. petitioner claims harassment and match-fixing allegations. (Para 2 , 3)
3. court highlights failures of federation in addressing complaints. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
4. consideration of suspension of federation's executive committee. (Para 13 , 14 , 15)
5. constitution of committee of administrators to manage federation. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)

JUDGMENT

VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING

Rekha Palli, J. (Oral)

1. The present petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been preferred by a top-ranked Table Tennis player who has been representing India since 2008 in various tournaments internationally, being aggrieved by the actions of the respondent no. 1, which it is alleged, is against the interest of the players. The Petitioner has consequently also assailed the "Rules and Regulations for National Camp" (hereinafter referred to as the `Rules') introduced by the said respondent on 04.08.2021, mandating compulsory attendance of players at the `National Coaching Camp', in order to be selected for international events. It is the Petitioner's case

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTREKHA PALLIManika Batra – AppellantVersusTable Tennis Federation of India – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
REKHA PALLI
Manika Batra – Appellant
Versus
Table Tennis Federation of India – Respondent