SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Siddharth Mridul, Anup Jairam Bhambhani, JJ.
Jasvinder Kaur - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(Crl.) 1388 of 2021 & Crl. M.A. No. 11699 of 2021
Decided On : 18-02-2022




The grounds for preventive detention must be communicated in a language the detenu understands to ensure the right to make effective representation, as mandated by Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 482 - Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Section 3(1) - Habeas corpus petition seeking release of son from illegal detention. Respondents failed to communicate the grounds of detention in a language understood by the detenu as mandated by Article 22(5) of the Constitution, violating his right to make an effective representation against detention. The court emphasized the need for grounds to be comprehensible, not merely translated orally. Detention order quashed. (Paras 11, 12, 14, 15)

Table of Content
1. introduction of the case and basis for detention (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. grounds of challenge to the detention order (Para 4)
3. arguments related to communication of detention order (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
4. judicial precedents supporting the need for effective communication (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
5. legal conclusions about the requirement of communication in a language understood by the detenu (Para 12 , 13)
6. conclusion on quashing of the detention order (Para 14 , 15 , 16)
7. disposition of the judgment and communications directives (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)

JUDGMENT

Anup Jairam Bhambhani, J. The petitioner Jasvinder Kaur has filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking a direction in the nature of habeas corpus for the production of her son, Harmeet Singh, who the petitioner alleges, has been illegally detained by the respondents. After amendment of the array of party-respondents, the respondents in the proceedings are the Union of India, Through Its Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue (Central Economic Intelligence Bureau); Joint Secretary (COFEPOSA); and The Commissioner of Customs, Terminal-3, IGI Airport, New Delhi, which parties are hereinafter collectively referred to as the `Ministry' or the `respondents'.

2. The petitioner further seeks quashing of detention order bearing No. PD-12002/05/2020-COFEPOSA dated 05.06.2020 issued under section 3(1) of the CONSERVATION OF FOREIGN EXCHANGE AND PREVENTION OF SMUGGLING ACTIVITIES ACT , 1974 (COFEPOSA Act) by the Joint Secretary COFEPOSA (the "impugned detention order") under which the petitioner's son is in preventive detention with The Superintendent, Tihar Jail, New Delhi, which detention order also stands confirmed by the Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance vidi order dated 11.08.2021.

3. As per the record, the Ministry's case against the petitioner's son is this :

(i) A specific intelligence input is stated to have been received on 01/02.02.2019 by the Assistant Commissioner, Green Channel (Shift-D) at the Indira Gandhi International Airport (IGI Airport) about smuggling of drones, goods, cigarettes and certain other items in commercial quantity by six passengers on different flights. Pursuant to this intelligence input, customs officers along with officers of the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) approached Exit Gate No. 5 of the Arrival Hall, IGI Airport to intercept eight passengers, including the petitioner herself; and upon conducting search of their baggage, certain objectionable goods were found in the baggage of two persons, Gagan Jot Singh and Gurpreet Singh.

(ii) Subsequently, on information allegedly given by Gagan Jot Singh, on the intervening night of 01.02.2019 and 02.02.2019, at around 1:30 a.m. the petitioner's son, Harmeet Singh who arrived at IGI Airport from Dubai via Kuwait Airways-Flight No. KU381 was also apprehended for carrying contraband items and goods, along with three other persons, by name Sumit Verma, Sourabh Chopra and Amarjeet Singh.

(iii) Notice under section 102 of the CUSTOMS ACT , 1962 ( CUSTOMS ACT ) was served upon Harmeet Singh on 02.02.2019; officers of the Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance recorded his statement under section 108 of the CUSTOMS ACT , which is stated to have been self-incriminating in nature. Importantly, it is the case of the respondents that the statement of Harmeet Singh was typed in the English language and was stated to have been explained to him in the vernacular by an interpreter.

(iv) As per the impugned detention order, upon search of Harmeet Singh's bags the following items were found :

    i. 238 dandas of Benson & Hedges Cigarettes;

    ii. Boarding Pass dated 01.02.2019 for Flight No. KU381 (Kuwait to Delhi) with seat No. 2H;

    iii. Indian Passport No. Z5317414 issued on 16.01.2019;

    iv. One Vivo Y53 mobile with Vodafone Sim No. 8860253525;

    v. UAE Dirham 30

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top