SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Gau) 6

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OFASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH
MANISH CHOUDHURY, DEVASHIS BARUAH, JJ.
Chinneilhing Haokip @ Neopi D/O Thangboi Hoakip – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Nagaland And 3 Ors – Respondents
W.P.(Crl.) 13 of 2024
Decided on : 22-01-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : V. SIRIE, TAHLEM,TAHLEM YANGTHOK
For the Respondent: GOVT ADV NL,

Preventive detention requires a clear link between past conduct and future risk; failure to communicate grounds in an understandable language violates constitutional rights.

Headnote:(A) Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 - Section 3(1) - Detention Order challenged - Detenu detained for alleged involvement in drug trafficking - Court found no prior criminal antecedents of detenu, and the detention order was based on insufficient grounds and stale materials - Detention Order quashed for violation of Article 22(5) of the Constitution. (Paras 11, 40)

(B) Preventive Detention - Legal standards - Detaining authority must provide grounds of detention in a language understood by the detenu to ensure effective representation - Failure to do so renders the detention order unsustainable. (Paras 30, 39)

Facts of the case:
The detenu was arrested on 05.04.2024 during a routine vehicle check, where suspected heroin was found concealed in the vehicle. A detention order was issued on 30.05.2024 based on a proposal from the police, citing the need to prevent further illicit trafficking.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the detention order lacked sufficient grounds, as the detenu had no prior criminal record, and the materials relied upon were inadequate to justify preventive detention.

Issues: The main issues included whether the detention order was justified given the lack of prior offenses and whether the detenu was adequately informed of the grounds for her detention.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the detention order was invalid as it did not meet the legal requirements for preventive detention, particularly regarding the communication of grounds in a comprehensible language.

Result: The detention order was quashed, and the detenu was ordered to be released if not required in any other case.

JUDGMENT :

[Manish Chodhury, J]

The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is preferred on behalf of a detenu, Smti. Chinneilhing Haokip @ Neopi [hereinafter referred to as ‘the detenu’, for short] by the detenu’s elder sister, Smti. Lhingneikim Haokip as the next friend to challenge a Detention Order bearing no. CON/PITNDPS/15/2024/69 dated 30.05.2024 passed by the Special Secretary to the Government of Nagaland, Home Department [the respondent no.2] as the Detaining Authority in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section [1] of Section 3 of the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 [‘the PIT NDPS Act’, for short] and all other consequential orders passed thereafter. By the Detention Order dated 30.05.2024, the detenu was detained and kept in the District Jail, Dimapur for an initial period of 3 [three] months.

2. It appears relevant to delineate the previous events which purportedly led to the passing of the Order of Detention dated 30.05.2024, at first.

3. A First Information Report [FIR] [Suo Moto] was lodged before the Officer In-Charge, Narcotic Police Station, Police Headquarters [PHQ], Nagaland, Kohima on 06.04.2024 by one Pangerlemba Sangtam, an Assistant Sub-Inspector [ASI] attached to Narcotic Police Station, PHQ, Kohima stating inter-alia that on 05.04.2024, he and a team of police personnel were detailed for MVCP duty and accordingly, routine checkings of vehicles were being carried out by the team at a place in between Khuzama and Vizwema, near Agri-Link Road. During such routine checkings, at around 20-00 hours on 05.04.2024, one vehicle bearing registration no. AS-03/T-4234 [Mahindra TUV – red colour] [‘the subject-vehicle’, for short] which was coming from Manipur side, was made to stop for checking. On checking, the subject-vehicle was found to have the following three occupants including the driver, :-

    [i] Nehkoi Guite [driver] [53 yrs/M], S/o - Zonsei Guite, Add - Zomi Villa, North AOC, Porompat, Imphal East, P/add - Kangpokpi, P.O./P.S. - Kangpokpi, Dist. - Kangpokpi, Manipur.

    [ii] Hoinu @ Vahboi, [50 yrs/F], W/o - Nehkoi Guite, Add - Zomi Villa, North AOC, Porompat, Imphal East, P/add - Kangpokpi, P.O./P.S. - Kangpokpi, Dist. - Kangpokpi, Manipur.

    [iii] Chenneilhing [43 yrs/F], W/o - Angam, Add - Patjong, P.O./P.S. - Kangpokpi, Dist. - Kangpokpi, Manipur.

The informant had further mentioned that on inspection of the subject-vehicle, items, suspected to be narcotic drugs, were detected and information was immediately given to the superior officers. The Gazetted Police Officer, the Officer In-Charge, Khuzama Police Station and independent witnesses were called to the place to conduct search and seizure. The subject-vehicle was, thereafter, checked in presence of the witnesses and the suspected accused persons/occupants were also informed of their rights to be searched in presence of a Magistrate or a Gazetted Officer, after which body searches were carried out in presence of the Gazetted Officer.

3.1. The informant further stated that during search, narcotic drugs, suspected to be Heroin, packed in 20 [twenty] soap boxes, were found concealed inside the gear level cover of the subject-vehicle and accordingly, those were seized. In addition, the subject-vehicle with its ignition key and connected vehicular documents, a cash amount of Rs. 1,43,000/- and other items were seized from the possession of the accused persons by preparing a Seizure Memo, in presence of the independent witnesses, the Gazetted Police Officer, etc. The suspected narcotic drugs [Heroin] were weighed separately, with and without the soap box covers. On weighment, the total weight was found to be 239 gms [approx.], without the soap box covers. The informant further mentioned that the seizure process was carried out under videography. The seized contraband items were then serially marked, packed and sealed, with attestations of the independent witnesses, the Gazette

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top