SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
V.KAMESWAR RAO
Karambir Singh Khatri – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board – Respondent


Table of Content
1. force majeure due to covid-19 affects contractual obligations. (Para 1 , 4)
2. petitioner argues for reduction of license fee. (Para 2 , 3)
3. respondent insists on adherence to contract terms. (Para 5 , 9)
4. court analyzing prima facie case for interim relief. (Para 6)
5. clause 18 interpreted as a force majeure provision. (Para 7 , 8)
6. court orders deposit for balance fee to prevent coercive action. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)

JUDGMENT

V. Kameswar Rao, J. (Oral)

CM APPL. 5951/2022 in W.P.(C) 2067/2022

CM APPL. 5953/2022 in W.P.(C) 2068/2022

1. These applications have been filed seeking a restraint order against the respondent from demanding/recovering the payment of Rs.4,75,01,672/- (W.P.(C) 2067/2022) and Rs.2,10,63,888/- (W.P.(C) 2068/2022) from the petitioner and with a further direction that the respondent be restrained from taking any coercive action for non-payment of the aforesaid amounts. It is the submission of Mr. Kirti Uppal, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, that the petitioner was awarded two contracts with regard to car parking sites at Shivaji Place, West Delhi, District Centre, Raja Garden, Delhi (W.P.(C) 2067/2022) and G-Block, Jahangir Puri, b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top