SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV NARULA
P.K. Advertising Services Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
North Delhi Municipal Corporation – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Narula, J. (Oral)--Pursuant to the order dated 2nd May, 2022, Ms. Mini Pushkarna, counsel for North Delhi Municipal Corporation [hereinafter, "NDMC"], states on instructions that she is agreeable if the Court were to appoint an Arbitrator in the instant petition. Ms. Manmeet Arora, counsel for the Petitioner, is also agreeable to the same.

2. Although the present petition is under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [hereinafter, "the Act"], the Court is inclined to accept the request for appointment of arbitrator since there is a consensus between the parties. That said, existence of arbitration agreement between the parties in terms of Clause 28.2 of the License Agreement which forms part of the Tender document dated 22nd April, 2016, is not in dispute. Accordingly, parties are referred to arbitration before Hon'ble Mr. Justice (Retd.) Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, former judge of this Court [+91-9717495002] for adjudication of disputes arising from the Tender document and Allotment Letter dated 17th June, 2016.

3. The parties are directed to appear before the Sole Arbitrator as and when notified. This is subject to the Arbitrator making necessary d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top