Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
REKHA PALLI
Rahul Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
University of Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. detailing the petitioner's admission circumstances. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding admissions process and errors. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's evaluation of eligibility and responsibility. (Para 7) |
| 4. final dismissal of the writ petition. (Para 8) |
JUDGMENT
Rekha Palli, J. (ORAL)--The petitioner, a graduate from the Delhi University, has approached this Court with a grievance that, despite his having applied for admission in the LLB course offered by the respondent-University under the `Ward' category (non-teaching) quota on 21.08.2021, his candidature has not been considered by the respondent for admission in the said category.
2. It is the petitioner's case that despite applying for admission under the `Ward' category (non-teaching) quota and having secured the highest marks in the said quota, he is being denied admission on the sole ground that he had not uploaded the requisite certificate received from his father's employer, to avail the benefits of the `Ward' category (non-teaching) quota.
3. The petitioner claims that the relevant certificate could not be uploaded on the respondent's web portal only on account of a technical glitch in the website of
The failure to comply with mandatory admission procedures, even due to technical issues, precludes granting relief to a candidate after deadlines have passed.
Point of law : Grant of any relief to the petitioner, who has treated the mandatory requirement of uploading the requisite certificate in the most casual manner, would be at the cost of the students ....
The court emphasized the importance of reservation for OBC candidates to encourage higher education and held that the respondent's action in not approving the petitioner’s admission was arbitrary and....
The court held that once an applicant has submitted their category for admission, changes post-application, especially after results are declared, are impermissible to maintain orderly admissions.
The case established the principle that prompt and diligent action in seeking remedies is crucial in admission-related matters, especially when faced with a defective process.
A candidate seeking admission must demonstrate diligence in pursuing remedies to secure relief; failure to do so, even in light of procedural issues, results in denial of admission rights.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the University's policy of not permitting editing in the category of application, as provided in the Information Bulletin, was reasonable and ....
The main legal point established is that in certain circumstances, courts may intervene to grant admission to students who face genuine difficulties in completing formalities, especially when it does....
Procedural adherence in university admissions is critical; applicants must comply with established rules to maintain application integrity and facilitate fair reservations.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
