SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Sonu Khatri – Appellant
Versus
State (G.N.C.T of Delhi) – Respondent


Table of Content
1. court's consideration of factual background (Para 1 , 5)
2. arguments regarding bail application (Para 2 , 3)
3. court's analysis and observations on allegations (Para 4 , 6)
4. conclusion on bail application decision (Para 7 , 8)

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Ohri, J. (ORAL)

1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the applicant seeking regular bail in FIR No. 492/2020 registered under Sections 376/506/34 IPC and Sections 6/17 of the POCSO Act at P.S. Narela, Delhi.

2. Mr. R.N. Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is in custody since 17.11.2020 and the charge sheet having been filed, he is no longer required for any investigation. It is further submitted that the prosecutrix in the present case is the daughter of the applicant, who had filed the present complaint at the instance and at the behest of her mother with whom, the applicant has pending matrimonial dispute. It is submitted that the allegations levelled against the applicant are false and unbelievable. It is submitted that in the complaint it has been alleged that although the first incident is stated to have been committed in June, 201

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top