SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 885

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR, J
SAKUR KHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Navneet Singh Birk, Mr. Neeraj Kumar Gurjar, GA cum AAG, Mr. Lalit Kishor Sen, PP

Order :

1. This application for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C . (483 BNSS) has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.163/2024 registered at Police Station Kolayat, District Bikaner for the offences under Section 137(2) of BNS and Section 9(m)/10 of POCSO.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

3. As per the prosecution story, the petitioner who is aged about 27 years, on 02.10.2024, around 6:30 pm, took the complainant’s four years old daughter namely ‘N’ under the pretext of offering her prasad. As per the prosecution, when the complainant and other family members of the victim ‘N’ started searching her, they found that the petitioner was trying to undress the minor girl.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. The family members of the victim ‘N’, owing to some previous animosity between the parties has changed the entire narrative of the incident and have falsely roped the petitioner in a criminal case. It was further argued that the petitioner is an innocent person; the investigation aga

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top