Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
D.N.PATEL, JYOTI SINGH
Alapan Bandyopadhyay – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge against the transfer order (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. petitioner's arguments on jurisdiction and rights (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. court's analysis on administrative powers of tribunal (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 22 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 4. administrative powers versus applicant rights comparison (Para 21) |
| 5. writ petition dismissal and procedural correctness (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
JUDGMENT
D.N. Patel, C.J. Present petition has been filed by the Petitioner assailing the order dated 22.10.2021, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the `Tribunal'), Principal Bench in P.T. No. 215 of 2021. Petitioner also seeks a direction that Original Application (O.A.) being O.A. No. 1619/2021 filed by the Petitioner be heard and disposed of by the Tribunal, Kolkata Bench.
2. Factual narrative is in a narrow compass and to the extent relevant to the controversy involved in the present petition is that Petitioner joined IAS in 1987 and was allocated the West Bengal Cadre. Petitioner superannuated on 31.05.2021 and at the time of his superannuation was working as the Chief Secretary of the State of West Bengal.
3.
The Chairman's administrative power to transfer cases under Section 25 of the Administrative Tribunal Act supersedes the applicant's right to choose the filing location under Rule 6(2) of the 1987 Ru....
The administrative power of the Chairman under Section 25 of the 1985 Act to transfer cases is distinct from the decision-making powers on the judicial side, and the scope of judicial review of an ad....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the transfer order violated the petitioner's fundamental right to equality before the law.
Power of judicial review of an order transferring an Original Application pending before a Bench of Tribunal to another Bench under Section 25 of Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 can be judicially ....
The Chairman of the CAT must consider the jurisdictional rights of employees and the administrative nature of transfer powers under the Central Administrative Act.
The Central Administrative Tribunal must act as a court of first instance, addressing factual inquiries rather than merely exercising judicial review powers.
The judgment emphasized the need for clarifying the territorial jurisdiction of High Courts under Article 226(2) in relation to challenges against orders passed by the Chairman, CAT, Principal Bench,....
Transfer orders made in the interest of administrative exigency are generally not subject to judicial interference unless proven to be mala fide or in violation of statutory provisions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
