SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLA
Amarjeet Singh Dagar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. details of petitioner's transfer and background. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
2. petitioner arguments against the transfer. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
3. court's reasoning on transfer legality. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29)
4. dismissal of petition with clarifications. (Para 30 , 31 , 32)

JUDGMENT

Navin Chawla, J. The present petition has been filed seeking setting aside of the order dated 04.09.2020 (hereinafter referred to as the `impugned order') passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (in short, the learned `CAT') in OA No. 1230 of 2020, dismissing the petition filed by the petitioner. The petitioner further prays for quashing and setting aside of the Office Order No. 21(19)/2020/Coord unit/C.E(W CUMTLQA)/EE-C II dated 09.04.2020 (hereinafter referred to as the `impugned Office Order') issued by the respondent no. 2, transferring the petitioner from New Delhi to Jaipur.

I. FACTS

2. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner, in June 1992, joined as a Section Officer in the Horticulture Wing of the respondent no.2. While in service, during the yea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top