Pankaj Bansal vs Superintendent of Police (HQ), Central Bureau of Investigation

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
YASHWANT VARMA
Pankaj Bansal – Appellant
Versus
Superintendent of Police (HQ), Central Bureau of Investigation – Respondent

Table of Content
1. petitioner's grievances and past court submissions. (Para 2 , 3)
2. representation treated as valid request to general mandate. (Para 4 , 5)
3. interpretation of allotment rules regarding deputation. (Para 6)
4. dismissal of the writ petition. (Para 7)

JUDGMENT

Yashwant Varma, J. (Oral)--This writ petition is thoroughly misconceived and clearly in abuse of the process of Court for reasons which follow.

2. Undisputedly, the order of 15 October 2020, which is impugned here, was questioned by the petitioner by preferring W.P.(C) 10727/2020. That writ petition came to be disposed of by a learned judge on 18 December 2020 in the following terms: -

"3 The petitioner's grievance is that the demand of roughly Rs.97,442/- along with interest @ 6.85% p.a. w.e.f. 2013 is an exorbitant amount which he cannot afford, therefore he would like the Department to reconsider its demand and accommodate his request. The learned counsel for the petitioner argues that since the petitioner was in the same station, therefore, on merits, he would be entitled to retain the said residential accommodation.

4 The learned Standing Counsel for the respondent submits, upon instructions, that there

Click Here to Read the rest of this document