SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Monty – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. termination of contract by letter. (Para 1)
2. petitioner argues improper grounds for termination. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. court observes lack of consideration of responses. (Para 10 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. court sets aside termination letters. (Para 16 , 17 , 19)
5. conclusion and rights reserved for both parties. (Para 18 , 20)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.

CM APPL. 14821-22/2022 (Exemption)

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 4987/2022&CM APPL. 14820/2022 (interim dir)

1. Petitioner impugns letter dated 11.03.2022 whereby the respondent has stated that the termination of the contract of the petitioner affected by order dated 27.10.2021 is correct and holds good. Further, petitioner has been debarred from participating in the tender invited by Delhi Division for next two years.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned termination letter dated 11.03.2022 is bereft of any reasoning and does not even take into account the response given by the petitioner to the show cause notice.

3. Learned counsel further submits that earlier a termination letter dated 27.10.2021 which is also referred to the impugned communication

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top