DELHI HIGH COURT
MUKTA GUPTA, NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Kanwarjeet Singh – Appellant
Versus
Registrar Co-operative Societies – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's ordeal in flat allotment (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. society's discriminatory demands against petitioner (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court orders immediate action for flat allotment (Para 9) |
| 4. petition and applications disposed (Para 10 , 11) |
JUDGMENT
Mukta Gupta, J. (Oral)--Respondent No.4 i.e. the Society has been served through ordinary process as per the service report dated 15th November, 2021. However, till date, no reply affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent No.4.
2. This present petition reveals the ordeal faced by the petitioner in getting a flat allotted to him in Category-`A' despite being a member of the Society.
3. The petitioner became a member of the respondent No.4/Society in the year 2004 and till October, 2006, he deposited a sum of Rs.26 lakhs with the Society towards costs of Category-`A' flat which was the total cost of the said flat. Since the society did not allot a flat to the petitioner, the petitioner filed an Arbitration claim under Section 70 of the Delhi Co-operative Societies Act, 2003 (in short the `DCS Act') pursuant whereto an Award dated 25th September, 2014 was passed in favour of the petitioner. As per the Awar
The court emphasized the necessity for the Registrar to enforce Arbitration Awards and prevent discrimination by co-operative societies against members.
The finality of the award and the obligation of the Society to implement it.
Compliance with the legal provisions for membership approval, deposit, and documentation is crucial, and failure to dispute anomalies in the documents can weaken the petitioner's case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.