SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SHAKDHER, JASMEET SINGH
Ge Energy Parts Inc – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax – Respondent


Table of Content
1. application for nil withholding tax rate. (Para 1)
2. arguments against the ao's conclusion. (Para 2)
3. revenue's support for ao's order. (Para 3)
4. court's observations on future applications. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
5. disposition of writ petitions. (Para 8 , 9)

JUDGMENT

[Physical Court Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]

Rajiv Sjakdher, J. (Oral)--The above-captioned writ petitions are directed against the order(s) dated 23.09.2021, passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) in respect of the application(s) preferred by the petitioners under Section 197 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short "the Act"]. To be noted, the said application(s) relate to Financial Year (FY) 2021-2022.

1.1. The purpose with which the aforementioned application(s) were preferred by the petitioners for the FY 2021-2022, was that the payer should not withhold any money towards tax i.e., the withholding tax should be pegged at "Nil" rate.

1.2. Via the impugned order(s), the AO has concluded that the withholding tax rate should be pegged at 4%.

2. Mr Sachit Jolly, who appears on behalf of the petitioners, submits that the order passed by the AO is wholly erroneous, as, in another proceedings car

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top