SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Vibhu Bakhru, J.
Karam Chand Thapar & Bros. (Coal Sales) Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
MMTC Ltd. - Respondent
OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 258 of 2018 & EA(OS) Nos. 1026 of 2019, 188 of 2020, 16240 of 2018 & 8918 of 2019
Decided On : 04-04-2022




In enforcement of arbitral awards, the applicable exchange rate for foreign currency amounts is determined by the date the award became final, not the date of demand.

Headnote:(A) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 36 - Enforcement of Arbitral Award dated 07.01.2017 - Contention over conversion rate for foreign currency award - Petitioner seeks conversion rate at SLP dismissal date, while respondent asserts first demand date - Finality of award determines applicable exchange rate at Rs.70.1445 on 29.04.2019. (Paras 2, 25)

(B) Arbitral awards - Enforcement must follow the terms of the award; the execution court cannot re-evaluate substantive issues. (Paras 10, 24)

Facts of the case:
Parties entered a contract for handling imported coal; disputes arose, leading to arbitration culminating in the Arbitral Award. The petitioner claimed enforcement, specifically over the USD to INR conversion rate. Respondent challenged the conversion reliance on the date of demand rather than the SLP dismissal.

Findings of Court:
The conversion rate for computing awarded amounts is to be taken as applicable on the date of SLP dismissal, reinforcing the finality of the award.

Issues: Main issues were the correct conversion date for foreign currency amounts due under the arbitral award.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reiterated the rule that the rate applicable to the foreign currency component hinges on the finality of the arbitral award.

Result: Petition disposed; remaining amount to be disbursed accordingly.

Table of Content
1. controversy over foreign exchange conversion rate. (Para 1 , 2)
2. factual basis of the dispute and award details. (Para 3 , 4)
3. parties' arguments regarding the applicable conversion rates. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
4. court's reasoning on enforcement of the arbitral award. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
5. precedent and its implications on the current case. (Para 14 , 15 , 16)
6. final decision on the applicable exchange rate and order. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)

JUDGMENT

Vibhu Bakhru, J. The petitioner (Decree Holder) has filed the present petition under Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter 'the A&C Act') seeking to enforce an Arbitral Award dated 07.01.2017 (hereafter the 'Arbitral Award'). The Arbitral Award has been enforced to a substantial extent.

2. The only contentious issue that remains to be addressed is regarding the rate of conversion of foreign exchange to be applied for determining the amount required to satisfy the Arbitral Award to the extent of the amount awarded in foreign currency (US Dollars). The petitioner claims that the rate of conversion is to be determined with reference to the date on which the respondent's (Judgment Debtor's) Special Leave Petition (SLP) was dismissed by the Supreme Court and the Arbitral Award became final. The respondent (hereafter 'MMTC') contends that the rate of conversion is to be reckoned in reference to the date when the demand for the same was made by the petitioner for the first time (that is, on 15.05.2010).

3. Briefly stated the relevant facts necessary to address the aforesaid controversy are as under:

3.1. The petitioner is a company incorporated in India and is engaged in the business of stevedoring and handling, cleaning and forwarding, transportation and escorting etc. MMTC is a Public Sector Undertaking.

3.2. National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd. (hereafter 'NTPC Ltd.'), a public sector undertaking, had placed an order with MMTC for import of coal and supply to its various power stations in the country. Accordingly, MMTC had entered into an Agreement dated 01.06.2005 with the petitioner, whereby the petitioner was engaged as a stevedoring and handling contractor for handling imported coal from foreign vessels at the port of discharge (Paradip Port) and, for its transportation to NTPC Ltd's Thermal Power Station, Kaniha at Talcher, for the period June, 2005 to May, 2006.

3.3. Disputes arose between the parties in connection with the said contract. The same were referred to arbitration under the aegis of the Indian Council for Arbitration. The Arbitral Tribunal comprised of three former High Court Judges. The arbitral proceedings culminated in the Arbitral Award dated 07.01.2017, which is sought to be enforced in this petition.

3.4. The operative part of the Arbitral Award reads as under:

    "AWARD

    Accordingly, the Arbitral Tribunal proceeds to make this award holding the Claimant entitled to recover from the Respondent the following amounts:

    1. Rs.1,27,62,425/- under claim No.1 on account of service charges;

    2. USD 2,42,445.03 under claim No.2 on account of despatch money;

    3. Rs.17,46,576/- with Rs.2,22,688.44 towards interest @10% per annum from 02.06.2009 till 09th September, 2010, the date of the filing of the statement of Claim, total Rs.19,69,264.44, under claim No. 3, on account of bank guarantee charges.

    4. Under claim No.1 for an amount of Rs.95,30,830.50 towards pendente lite interest from 09th September, 2010, the date of filing of the claim till the date of the award, at the rate of 12% per annum on Rs.1,27,62,425/-.

    5. Under claim No.2 for an amount of USD 1,81,106.43 towards pendente lite interest from 09th September, 2010, the date of filing of the claim till the date of the award, at the rate of 12% per annum on USD 2,42,445/43.

    6. Under claim No.3 for an amount of Rs.13.04,692/27 towards pendente lite interest from 09th September, 2010, the date of filing of the claim till the date of the award, at the rate o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top