SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIBHU BAKHRU
Karam Chand Thapar & Bros. (Coal Sales) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
MMTC Ltd. – Respondent


Table of Content
1. controversy over foreign exchange conversion rate. (Para 1 , 2)
2. factual basis of the dispute and award details. (Para 3 , 4)
3. parties' arguments regarding the applicable conversion rates. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
4. court's reasoning on enforcement of the arbitral award. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
5. precedent and its implications on the current case. (Para 14 , 15 , 16)
6. final decision on the applicable exchange rate and order. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)

JUDGMENT

Vibhu Bakhru, J. The petitioner (Decree Holder) has filed the present petition under Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter 'the A&C Act') seeking to enforce an Arbitral Award dated 07.01.2017 (hereafter the 'Arbitral Award'). The Arbitral Award has been enforced to a substantial extent.

2. The only contentious issue that remains to be addressed is regarding the rate of conversion of foreign exchange to be applied for determining the amount required to satisfy the Arbitral Award to the extent of the amount awarded in foreign currency (US Dollars). The petitioner claims that the rate of conversion is to be determined with reference to the date on which the respondent's (Judgment D

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top