SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MUKTA GUPTA, NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Srivenkateshware Tradex Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner, Delhi Value Added Tax – Respondent


Table of Content
1. challenge to issuance of form 'c' (Para 1 , 2)
2. grounds for denying form 'c' (Para 3 , 4)
3. respondent's counterarguments (Para 5 , 6 , 17)
4. legal requirements of form 'c' (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 14 , 19)
5. entitlement based on system's failure (Para 18)
6. court's directive for issuance of form 'c' (Para 20)

JUDGMENT

Neena Bansal Krishna, J. (Oral)

1. This Writ Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India read with Section 8 of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as 'CST Act') has been filed to challenge the order dated 05th July, 2019 passed by the respondent denying the issue of prescribed statutory Form "C" to the petitioner in respect of purchases made in the Financial Year 2016-2017.

2. Facts in brief are that the petitioner, who is a registered dealer under the CST Act, had purchased goods in the course of interstate transactions against "C" Forms. By virtue of Section 8(4) of the CST Act, the respondent is obliged to issue Form "C" in respect of the purchases made on the strength of his Registration Certificate under CST Act. The petitioner was duly assessed for the Assessment Year 2016-17 and the Interstate purchases agai

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top