SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MUKTA GUPTA, NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Cement Corporation of India – Appellant
Versus
Promac Engineering Industries Limited – Respondent


Table of Content
1. challenge to procedural orders under a&c act. (Para 5 , 6)
2. court's interpretations of section 9 of a&c act. (Para 7 , 9 , 10)
3. unfounded contentions regarding maintainability. (Para 8)
4. dismissal of appeal and disposal of application. (Para 11 , 12)

JUDGMENT

Mukta Gupta, J. (Oral)

CM APPL. 9237/2022 (for exemption)

1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions.

2. Application is disposed of.

CM APPL. 9235/2022 (for condonation of delay of 29 days in filing appeal)

3. For the reasons stated in the application and in view of the period of limitat ion having been extended by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Suo Motu W.P.(C) 3/2020, Re: Cognizance for Extension of Limitation, delay of 29 days in filing the appeal is condoned.

4. Application is disposed of.

FAO (OS)(COMM) 44/2022

5. In the present appeal, the appellant challenges the impugned orders dated 20th December 2021, 17th December 2018 and 24th August 2021.

6. By the order dated 20th December 2021, the learned Single Judge dismissed OMP(I)(COMM) 410/2021 filed by the appellant under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short, the `A&C Act'), wherein, it was inter alia praye

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top