SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJNISH BHATNAGAR
Sunil Tomar – Appellant
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi – Respondent


Table of Content
1. factual basis of the fir and case. (Para 2)
2. parties have settled the dispute amicably. (Para 3 , 4)
3. acknowledgment of settlement in court. (Para 5 , 6)
4. judicial considerations for quashing fir. (Para 7 , 8)
5. past judgements establish guidelines. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
6. quashing the fir due to settlement. (Para 12)
7. petition disposed of with fir quashed. (Para 13)

ORDER

Rajnish Bhatnagar, J. This is a petition filed by the petitioner under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No. 549/2016, under Sections 406/420/34 IPC, registered at Police Station Dwarka, South West District, Delhi, and all proceedings emanating therefrom.

2. In brief the facts of the case are that the instant case was registered on the complaint of Sh. Satyender Singh (Respondent No. 2 herein) S/o Sh. Sukhbir Singh R/o 2B/182, Awas Vikas Colony Baraut, District Baghpat U.P, filed against Sunil Dev, Sunil Tomar (Petitioner herein) and Sunil Sharma. In the said complaint it is alleged that accused No. 2 is an old friend and well aware about financial position of the complainant. In August, 2013 accused No. 2 hatched a criminal conspiracy with accused No. 1 and 3 to cheat the complainant a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top