SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJNISH BHATNAGAR
Mukesh Bhatia – Appellant
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petition filed under article 226. (Para 1)
2. details of the alleged cheating scheme. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
3. settlement reached among parties. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
4. court's observations on quashing fir. (Para 8 , 9)
5. quashing of certain fir sections. (Para 10)
6. order and conclusion of the case. (Para 11 , 12)

JUDGMENT

Rajnish Bhatnagar, J. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing of the FIR No. 566/2017 under Section 420/468/34 IPC and further added Sections 471/174A/120B registered at P.S. Mandawali Fazalpur, East Delhi and the proceedings emanating therefrom.

2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the present case was registered on the complaint of Dr. Dharamveer Singh Baliyan alleging that on 30.07.2009 his wife Smt. Usha Rani had applied for an outlet retailer shop Petrol Pump of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, at her plot Khurza Zewar Road in UP. On 05.10.2009 she received a registered letter from Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited for interview on 21/10/2009 at Mathura Refinery, in U P, thereafter, the co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top