Hardwari Lal Rana vs Union of India

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
MUKTA GUPTA, NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Hardwari Lal Rana – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks quashing of award and directions against dispossession. (Para 1 , 2)
2. earlier judgment deemed acquisition proceedings lapsed; supreme court remands matter. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. disputed possession and validity of acquisition proceedings discussed. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. doctrine of merger not applied; petition dismissed as per constitution bench ruling. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
5. order to be published on court website. (Para 15)

JUDGMENT

Mukta Gupta, J. (Oral)--The present petition was filed by the petitioner seeking a writ of certiorari quashing the impugned Award No.8/91-92 dated 6th February, 1992 pursuant to the Notification No.F11(1)86-L&B/(2) dated 7th February, 1990 under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (in short `the Act'). That the declaration under Section 6 of the Act as also the award no.8/91-92 dated 6th February, 1992 has lapsed in respect of Khasra No.51/2 measuring 1 bigha Village Siraspur, Delhi-110042. Directions are also sought not to dispossess the petitioners from the said land measuring 1 bigha Village Siraspur, Delhi-110042.

2. In the writ petition, the petitioners have impleaded Union of India, Delhi Devel

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTMUKTA GUPTA, NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAHardwari Lal Rana – AppellantVersusUnion of India – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
MUKTA GUPTA, NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Hardwari Lal Rana – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent