SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MUKTA GUPTA, NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Hardwari Lal Rana – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Mukta Gupta, J. (Oral)--The present petition was filed by the petitioner seeking a writ of certiorari quashing the impugned Award No.8/91-92 dated 6th February, 1992 pursuant to the Notification No.F11(1)86-L&B/(2) dated 7th February, 1990 under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (in short `the Act'). That the declaration under Section 6 of the Act as also the award no.8/91-92 dated 6th February, 1992 has lapsed in respect of Khasra No.51/2 measuring 1 bigha Village Siraspur, Delhi-110042. Directions are also sought not to dispossess the petitioners from the said land measuring 1 bigha Village Siraspur, Delhi-110042.

2. In the writ petition, the petitioners have impleaded Union of India, Delhi Development Authority and the Government of NCT of Delhi as respondent nos.1, 2 and 3 respectively.

3. The writ petition was disposed of by this Court vide the judgment dated 24th May, 2016 granting the benefit to the petitioners in terms of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (in short `the 2013 Act') which came into effect on 1st January, 2014 in terms of the decision in Pune Mu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top