SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 6030

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
C. Hari Shankar, J.
Quantum University - Appellant
Versus
International Quantum University For Integrative Medicine Inc - Respondent
O.M.P. (COMM) 260 of 2021
Decided On : 13-12-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Jayant Mehta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Samaksh Goyal, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Sudhir K. Makkar. Senior Advocate with Ms. Veronica Mohan, Ms. Veena Mathai and Ms. Keerti Gupta, Advocates, for the Respondent.

The court upheld the arbitration award canceling a domain name for being confusingly similar to prior registered domain names, emphasizing the importance of preventing confusion in online commerce.

Headnote:(A) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 34 - Domain Name Dispute - The award dated 4 May 2021 found that the petitioner's domain name www.quantumuniversity.edu.in infringed the respondent's prior registered domain names, resulting in a decision to cancel the petitioner's domain name due to bad faith registration. (Paras 2, 8, 79)

(B) The court held that the respondent had established rights in the quantumuniversity formative domain names, and the petitioner had no legitimate interest in the disputed domain name. (Paras 79(a), 79(b), 79(c))

(C) The court emphasized the importance of domain names as identifiers in commercial activity and the necessity to avoid confusion among internet users. (Paras 12, 31, 34)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner registered the domain name www.quantumuniversity.edu.in in 2017, while the respondent held prior registrations for similar domain names. The respondent claimed the petitioner’s domain name created confusion and was registered in bad faith. (Paras 1, 2)

Findings of Court:
The Tribunal determined that the registration of the petitioner's domain name was in bad faith and ordered its cancellation. (Paras 8, 79)

Issues: The main issues included whether the domain name was confusingly similar to the respondent's trademarks and whether the petitioner had legitimate rights to the domain name. (Paras 79(a), 79(b), 79(c))

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the petitioner’s domain name was confusingly similar to the respondent's prior registrations, leading to a likelihood of confusion, and emphasized the global nature of domain name rights. (Paras 79, 23.12)

Result: Petition dismissed, upholding the Tribunal's decision to cancel the domain name. (Para 25)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. Under challenge, in this petition preferred under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("the 1996 Act"), is an award dated 4 May 2021, passed by a learned Sole Arbitrator in arbitral proceedings instituted against the petitioner Quantum University, by the respondent International Quantum University for Integrative Medicine INC before the .IN Registry, under the .IN Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (INDRP).

2. The complaint instituted by the respondent sought cancellation of the domain name www.quantumuniversity.edu.in (in which "quantumuniversity" is known as the "Secondary Level Domain" or "SLD" and ".edu.in" is known as the "Top Level Domain" or "domain extension ") registered in favour of the petitioner on 4 August 2017. The respondent alleged that it was a prior registrant of the domain name www.quantumuniversity.com as well as various other domain names, all of which used the SLD "quantumuniversity" with various extensions, principally quantumuniversity.net, quantumuniversity.org, quantumuniversity.education and quantumuniversity.online. (They shall collectively be referred to as the "quantumuniversity formative domain names"). The domain name of the petitioner, which was www.quantumuniversity.edu.in, alleged the respondent, infringed the respondent's quantumuniversity.com domain name, which was registered prior in point of time, owing to the common "quantumuniversity" SLD. Clause 10 of the INDRP, which envisages cancellation of an infringing domain name was, therefore, pressed into service by the respondent. The impugned award finds the petitioner's domain name www.quantumuniversity.edu. in fact to be infringing the quantumuniversity formative domain names of the respondent, including www.quantumuniversty.com, in all of which "quantumuniversity" was the SLD. Inasmuch as the respondent's quantumuniversity formative domain names were registered prior in point of time to the registration of the domain name www.quantumuniversity.edu.in in favour of the petitioner on 4 August 2017, the respondent was found entitled to the relief sought by it. The impugned award, therefore, concludes thus:

    "The Tribunal thus concludes that the domain name "www.quantumuniversity.edu.in" is identified with Complainant's name, mark and services. Therefore, the adoption, registration and use of the disputed domain name by the respondent show bad faith and the same must be cancelled as prayed for. That is the present case squarely falls within the premises of bad faith registration and use, thus fulfilling the condition laid down in clause 4(c) of the INDRP Policy.

    VII. DISPOSITIONS

    The Arbitral Tribunal holds, that the Respondent's domain name www.quantumuniversity.edu.in is identical and confusingly similar to the name, trademark and brand name "QUANTUM UNIVERSITY" owned by the Complainant. The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the domain name www.quantumuniversity.edu.in and the same has been registered in bad faith. The three elements set out in paragraph 4 of the INDRP Policy have been established by the Complainant.

    Accordingly, and in terms of the INDRP Policy, the Arbitral Tribunal hereby directs that the disputed domain name www.quantumuniversity.edu.in be cancelled."

3. The petitioner, as the proprietor of the domain name www.quantumunversity.edu.in, has assailed the aforesaid award before this Court under Section 34 of the 1996 Act.

Relevant clauses of the INDRP

4. Before proceeding further, it would facilitate matters if the relevant clauses of the INDRP are reproduced:

    "1. Definitions

    "IN Registry: Wherever used in this policy and the rules hereunder .IN Registry refers to National Internet Exchange of India (NIXI), a company registered under section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956 (now Section 8 under Companies Act 2013).

    2. Purpose

    This .IN Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy") sets out the legal framework for resolution of dispute(s) between a domain name Registrant and t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top