SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV NARULA
Splendor Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Rajesh Kumar Pasricha – Respondent


Table of Content
1. introduction and background of the case (Para 1 , 2)
2. parties' arguments regarding securing amount (Para 3 , 4)
3. court's analysis of claim and security requirement (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
4. final judgment and order modifications (Para 15 , 16 , 17)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Narula, J. (Oral)--The Appellant [being the Counter-Claimant in arbitration], is aggrieved with the Order dated 08th November, 2021 [hereinafter, `Impugned Order'] passed by the Sole Arbitrator, deciding the Respondent's [Claimant in arbitration] application under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [hereinafter, `the Act'], whereby, inter alia, directions have been passed to secure an amount of Rs.1,42,35,279.50/- by way of fixed deposit receipts [hereinafter, `FDR'] or an irrevocable bank guarantee.

BACKGROUND:

2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the instant appeal are as follows:

2.1. Appellant No. 1 is a property developer and Appellant No. 2 is the owner of the underlying land. The Respondent entered into two agreements with Appellant No. 1, both dated 04th October, 2017, viz. a Space Buyer's Agreement [hereinafter, `SB

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top