Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Kamla Devi – Appellant
Versus
Jeet Singh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. early hearing application allowed. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. final order issued with directions. (Para 4 , 5 , 13) |
| 3. challenging order based on lack of reasoning. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. importance of reasons in judicial orders. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. claim petition must be reviewed appropriately. (Para 11 , 12) |
JUDGMENT
CM APPL. 7143/2022 (Early Hearing)
1. The present application has been filed under Section 151 CPC read with Section 4A and 25A of the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 on behalf of the appellant seeking early hearing of the appeal.
2. Mr. Rakesh, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1, and Ms. Archana Gaur, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2, accept notice and fairly do not oppose the prayer made in the application.
3. In view of the averments made in the application and the no- objection given by the learned counsels for the respondents, the application is allowed and the date of hearing is preponed. Date fixed in the matter stands cancelled.
4. Application is disposed of.
FAO 78/2018
5. With the consent of the parties, the present appeal is taken up for hearing today itself.
6. By way of present appeal, the appellant (mother of the d
The court reiterated that all judicial orders must include explicit reasoning to be valid, ensuring adherence to natural justice principles.
Object for enacting Employees' Compensation Act even as early as 1923 was to ameliorate hardship of economically poor employees.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of providing reasons in orders, granting liberty when allowing withdrawal of claim petitions, and interpreting labor statutes as ben....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of citing reasons in an order, the beneficial nature of the Employees' Compensation Act, and the need to interpret its provisions in....
A widow's entitlement to monetary compensation following the death of her spouse, subsequent claims for compassionate employment, and the court's stance on delay and logical conclusions regarding suc....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of recording reasons in orders, as an order passed without reasons is not sustainable under the law.
The court upheld the Labour Court's order under Section 4(A) of the Employee’s Compensation Act, confirming the necessity of providing opportunity and addressing delays in compensation cases.
The appellate court confirmed that findings based on factual determinations by the Commissioner under the Employees' Compensation Act are not subject to appeal unless substantial legal questions aris....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
