MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
In The Matter Of: Hakim Singh – Appellant
Versus
New Kanpur Agra Trasport Company – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J.
1. The present appeal has been instituted under Section 30 of the Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter, referred to as the 'Act') on behalf of the appellant/claimant assailing the order dated 13.09.2017 passed by the learned Commissioner, Employees’ Compensation Act, District- West, Karampura, Delhi in Case No. WC/31/WD/17.
2. In his petition(s) filed before the learned Commissioner for compensation under Section 22 of the Act, the appellant claimed that he was employed as a driver with respondent No.1 on vehicle bearing No. UP-78-CN-8951 (Truck) and on 01.09.2015, he met with an accident while driving the truck during the course of employment.
It was the case of the appellant that the accident had occurred on account of poor visibility near Barabanki, UP, as while he was driving over a flyover, construction dust in the air caused his vehicle to ram into another vehicle which was stranded on the bridge without any caution/signal or indicator etc.
It was further claimed that as he had received grievous injuries on both his legs due to the accident, for which he also remained hospitalized, the appellant had become 100% disabled for the purpose of
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of providing reasons in orders, granting liberty when allowing withdrawal of claim petitions, and interpreting labor statutes as ben....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of citing reasons in an order, the beneficial nature of the Employees' Compensation Act, and the need to interpret its provisions in....
Object for enacting Employees' Compensation Act even as early as 1923 was to ameliorate hardship of economically poor employees.
Labour statutes like the EC Act should be liberally construed in favor of employees for their welfare.
The court emphasized the need for evidence to prove material issues in a claim petition and the limited scope of interference in an appeal under Section 30 of the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923.
The court reiterated that all judicial orders must include explicit reasoning to be valid, ensuring adherence to natural justice principles.
The appellate court confirmed that findings based on factual determinations by the Commissioner under the Employees' Compensation Act are not subject to appeal unless substantial legal questions aris....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that in cases of disputed liability, the party should be granted an opportunity to lead evidence and cross-examine to prevent a miscarriage of j....
Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923 is a social welfare legislation and it must be given a beneficial construction – Matters thereunder are to be adjudicated with due process of law and also with a keen....
The court affirmed that under the Employees Compensation Act, the restoration of an employee's claim petition is permissible to uphold justice for the weaker section, but cautioned against repeated f....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.