SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA
Shadab – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, J.(Oral)--The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of petitioner for issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the Order No. F.18/96/2018/HG/1373 dated 07.10.2021 passed by the respondent and for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent to release the petitioner on parole for a period of three months.

2. In brief, petitioner is life convict, presently serving sentence in case FIR No. 67/2011, under Sections 302/377 of the Indian Penal Code, registered at P.S.: Aman Vihar, Delhi. The judgment and order on sentence dated 07.04.2014 and 08.05.2014 respectively are stated to have been upheld in Crl. A. No. 1609/2014 vide judgment dated 16.12.2015.

3. The petitioner is stated to have undergone incarceration for about 10 years and 10 months in actual without remission and has also earned remission of about 01 year 07 months and 11 days as on 05.05.2020.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had applied for grant of parole before the respondent vide application No.F.14/SCJ14/AS(CT)/PAROLE/2021/3372 d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top