SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
JMC Projects (India) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Indure Private Limited – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petition under arbitration act. (Para 1)
2. dispute from work order and arbitration clause. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. judicial decisions regarding arbitrator's ineligibility. (Para 8 , 10)
4. grounds for challenge of arbitrator. (Para 9)
5. ineligibility of arbitrator due to relationships. (Para 11 , 12 , 14)
6. invocation of arbitration clause and arbitration notices. (Para 16 , 17)
7. challenges to appointed arbitrators. (Para 18 , 19)
8. limits on arbitrator's appointment powers. (Para 28 , 29)
9. statutory incapacity of arbitrator and termination of mandate. (Para 38 , 39 , 41)
10. conclusion on appointment and continuation of arbitration. (Para 42 , 44 , 46 , 47)

JUDGMENT(Oral)

(Video-conferencing)

1. This petition has been preferred under Section 14 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as "the 1996 Act"), seeking a declaration that the mandate of the learned Arbitrator, presently arbitrating on the dispute between the petitioner and the respondent, stands terminated under Section 14 (1) (a) of the 1996 Act, and to appoint a substitute arbitrator, in his place, to continue with the said arbitral proceedings and render award therein.

2.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top