SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MUKTA GUPTA
Mainudeen – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Table of Content
1. conviction details and incident description. (Para 1 , 4)
2. arguments regarding victim's testimony and appellant's credibility. (Para 2 , 3)
3. analysis of witness statements and corroborating evidence. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
4. court’s decision on the affirmation of conviction. (Para 9)
5. final judgment and orders. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)

JUDGMENT

1. By this appeal, the appellant challenges the impugned judgment dated 23rd February, 2018 convicting the appellant for offences punishable under Sections 392 read with 397 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act and the order on sentence dated 28th February, 2018 whereby he was directed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 7 years and a fine of Rs.2000/- in default whereof to undergo simple imprisonment for 3 months for offences punishable under Section 392 read with Section 397 IPC and rigorous imprisonment for a period of 1 year and a fine of Rs.1000/- in default whereof to undergo simple imprisonment for 1 month for offence punishable under Section 25(1B)(b) Arms Act.

2. Assailing the impugned judgment, learned counsel for the appellant states that there are material discrepancies in the statements of the victim

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top