SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MUKTA GUPTA, NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Anju Kumari – Appellant
Versus
Puneet Kumar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Neena Bansal Krishna, J. (Oral)

CM APPL. 24526/2020 (Delay of 6 days in filing appeal)

1. By this application, the appellant seeks condonation of 6 days' delay in filing the appeal.

2. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 6 days in filing the appeal is condoned.

3. Application is disposed of.

MAT.APP.(F.C.) 112/2020

4. The present appeal has been filed by Anju Kumari (hereinafter referred to as `appellant') under Section 19 of the Family Court Act, 1984 (hereinafter `the Act, 1984) against the order dated 09th December, 2019 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, East, Karkardooma Court, whereby the learned Principal Judge denied the maintenance under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, (hereinafter referred to as the `Act, 1955').

5. The appellant got married to Puneet Kumar (hereinafter referred to as `respondent') according to Hindu rites and customs and one son, namely, Master Diyan was born from the said wedlock on 10th February, 2017. Differences arose and the parties have been living separately since 04th April, 2017. The respondent filed the petition for divorce under Section 13 (1) (ia) of the Act, 1955, which is pending tr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top