Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Ram Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. condonation of delay application filed. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. accident details and claim background. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. delay application based on alleged misrepresentation. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 4. criteria for sufficient cause in delay. (Para 7 , 10 , 12) |
| 5. legal standards guiding delay condonation. (Para 9 , 15 , 16 , 21) |
| 6. judicial discretion in condoning delays. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 7. issues with appellant's claims and evidence. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 8. court's findings and dismissal of appeal. (Para 28 , 29) |
JUDGMENT
Manoj Kumar Ohri, J.
CM APPL. 18372/2022 (Delay)
1. The present application has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act on behalf of the appellant seeking condonation of delay of 3738 days in filing the appeal.
2. By way of the present appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter, referred to as the `MV Act') read with Order 43 CPC, the appellant, who is the owner of the offending vehicle, has sought the following reliefs:
"A. Set aside the impugned judgment/award dt. 07/09/2011 passed in suit no. 16397/2011 titled Vida Devi & Anr. Vs. Paramjit & Ors. to the extent wherein recovery rights have been granted to the Ins
The main legal point established in the judgment is the significance of 'sufficient cause' for condonation of delay, emphasizing the need for a liberal but reasonable interpretation of the term and t....
Point of law: claim on account of impersonal machinery and inherited bureaucratic methodology of making several notes cannot be accepted in view of the modern technologies being used and available. T....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of 'sufficient cause' for condoning delay in filing appeals under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for a sufficient cause for not preferring the appeal within the prescribed period, emphasizing the need for a justice-oriented appr....
The court held that mere excuses do not constitute sufficient cause for condoning a significant delay in filing an appeal, emphasizing the need for diligence in pursuing legal remedies.
Section 173 provides that, any person aggrieved by the award passed by the Tribunal may approach the High Court within ninety days. However, the second proviso states that the High Court “may” still ....
claim on account of impersonal machinery and inherited bureaucratic methodology of making several notes cannot be accepted in view of the modern technologies being used and available. The law of limi....
The court must prioritize establishing 'sufficient cause' for inordinate delay before examining the merits of the appeal; liberal interpretation of limitation does not permit the condonation of gross....
The court emphasized the importance of introducing the concept of reasonableness while giving the clause 'sufficient cause' a liberal interpretation and highlighted the need to distinguish cases wher....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
