SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
DCM Shriram Limited – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax – Respondent


Table of Content
1. challenge to the notice issued under income tax act (Para 1)
2. arguments regarding existence of bioseed research india pvt. ltd. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
3. pending assessment precludes reassessment notice (Para 5 , 7)
4. petition allowed; respondent's liberty to act (Para 6 , 8)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral):

1. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the Notice dated 4th April, 2022 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (`the Act') in the name of Petitioner Company i.e. DCM Shriram Ltd. in respect of Permanent Account Number (`PAN') of Bioseed Research India Pvt. Ltd., which stood amalgamated with the Petitioner Company w.e.f. 1st April, 2013 in pursuance to the order passed by Delhi High Court under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 and is not in existence since then.

2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the impugned notice has been issued pursuant to the Notice dated 17th March, 2022 issued under Section 148A(b) of the Act in the name of Bioseed Research India Pvt. Ltd., which company is not in existence. He states that in the notice dated 17th March, 2022, issued in the name of Bioseed Research India Pvt. Ltd., the R

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top