SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, SAURABH BANERJEE
Ashwani Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Aditya Mannohar Bhide – Respondent


Table of Content
1. request for court fee refund following settlement. (Para 1 , 1 , 6)
2. dispute resolved by mediation agreement. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
3. court recognizes binding nature of settlement. (Para 5 , 7 , 8)
4. appeal dismissed due to compromise settlement. (Para 9 , 10)
5. judgment copy to be provided and uploaded. (Para 11)

JUDGMENT (Oral) CM APPL. 20758/2022

1. By way of the present application, appellant prays as under:

    "a. Permit the appellant to deposit demand draft bearing no.235487 dated 22.04.2022 for Rs.76,20,00,000/- drawn on State Bank of India with The Registrar General of this Court;

    b. Pass a decree in terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 20.04.2022 executed between the parties;

    c. Allow the appellant to obtain refund of the court fee of Rs.1,36,80,000/-."

2. Vide order dated 09.02.2022, the matter was referred to Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre for parties to explore possibility of settlement through mediation.

3. Learned counsel for the parties inform that subject matter of the dispute existing between the parties has been amicably resolved in terms of Settlement Agreement dated 20.04.2022 passed by Delhi High Court Mediation and Conci

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top