SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, SAURABH BANERJEE
Maunicka Makkar – Appellant
Versus
Madalsa Sood – Respondent


Table of Content
1. settlement reached in mediation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. application allowed based on settlement. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. eviction order noted despite settlement. (Para 7 , 8)
4. court fees refunded post-settlement. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

CM APPL. 31352/2022

1. Present application has been jointly filed by the appellants and the respondent under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 CPC for recording of the compromise arrived at between the parties.

2. Vide order dated 22.03.2022, the matter was referred to Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre for making an effort to amicably resolve their disputes.

3. Today, learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that parties inter-se has already settled their disputes before Delhi High Court Mediation & Conciliation Centre (SAMADHAN) vide Settlement Agreement dated 09.05.2022. Settlement Agreement is taken on record.

4. In view of above, application is allowed and disposed of.

RFA(OS) 3/2022 & CM APPL. 4542/2022

5. In view of order passed in CM APPL. 31352/2022, present appeal is

disposed of in terms of Settlement Agreement dated 09.05.2022.

6. Needless to say, parties shall be bound by the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top