SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Wearwell (India) Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Shambhu Prasad – Respondent


Table of Content
1. final conclusion: petition allowed, order set aside. (Para 1 , 6)
2. challenging the impugned order under the payment of wages act. (Para 2)
3. prior similar cases and orders challenged. (Para 3)
4. judgment based on parity with previous orders. (Para 4 , 5)

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)

CM APPL.25916/2022 (for exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of.

WP(C) 8614/2022 & CM APPL.25915/2022 (for stay)

2. The present petition has been filed against the order dated 07.08.2020, passed by the District & Sessions Judge, South-East, Saket Courts, New Delhi in RCA No.60/2019 in appeal under Section 17 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936.

3. The impugned order dated 07.08.2020 had also been challenged in the W.P.(C) 3373/2021 tiled M/s. Wearell (India) Private Limited vs. Manoj Kumar and WP(C) 3398/2021 titled M/s. Wearwell (India) Private Limited vs. Arun Kumar; WP(C) 2105/2022 titled Wearwell (India) Private Limited v. Dharmender Kumar Tanti; WP(C) 2034/2022 tiled Private Limited v. Mohd. Nizam; W.P.(C) 2106 titled Wearwell (India) Private Limited vs. Umesh Shah; WP(C) 2184 titled Wearwell (India) Private Limited vs. Raj

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top