SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Parshu Ram - Appellant
Versus
Kishan - Respondent
TR.P.(C.) 35 of 2022
Decided On : 30-05-2022




When multiple cases involve the same subject matter, consolidation is justified to ensure efficient adjudication and prevent conflicting judgments.

Headnote:(A) Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Section 24 - Transfer of cases - Petition filed seeking transfer of multiple cases to one Court due to identical subject matter - Respondent opposed transfer arguing it would cause delay and alleged collusion among parties - Court ordered consolidation of cases for efficient adjudication in competent jurisdiction. (Paras 1-6)

(B) Court's discretion - Transfer of cases can be justified when multiple cases revolve around the same subject matter to avoid conflicting judgments. (Paras 1-2)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought to consolidate four civil suits pending in different courts, asserting that they concern the same subject matter. Respondents argued that transferring cases would only postpone trial proceedings, hinting at collusion between some parties.

Findings of Court:
The transfer was deemed appropriate due to the overlapping issues in the cases, facilitating a unified approach to adjudication.

Issues: The main question was whether transferring the cases was warranted given the similarities in subject matter and potential delays.

Ratio Decidendi: The court affirmed the necessity of consolidating cases concerning the same issues to ensure consistent and efficient legal proceedings, emphasizing judicial efficiency over procedural delay.

Result: Petition for transfer allowed, and directions issued for case assignment.

Table of Content
1. details of petitions and cases involved. (Para 1)
2. grounds for opposing the transfer of cases. (Para 2 , 3)
3. court's decision on transferring cases. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
4. final order and directions to the parties. (Para 7 , 8)

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)

CAV.144/2022

Since learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 6 has entered appearance, the caveat stands discharged.

CM APPL.25904/2022 (exemption)

Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.

TR.P.(C.) 35/2022 & CM APPL.25903/2022 (stay)

1. Present petition has been filed seeking transfer of the following cases to one Court:

(i) Suit No.CS-341/21 titled as Amit Sharma vs. Parshu Ram & Ors. pending in the court of Shri Kumar Rahul, Civil Judge, North, Rohini Courts, Delhi.

(ii) Civil Suit No.719/21 titled as Shri Krishan vs. Parshu Ram & Ors. Pending in the court of Shri Shirish Aggarwal, ASCJ (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.

(iii) Suit No.CS-239-21 titled as Dharamveer Tyagi vs. Amit Sharma & Ors. pending in the court of Shri Sunil Kumar, ADJ-North, Rohini Court, Delhi.

(iv) Suit No. CS DJ No.60045/16 titled as Shri Krishan vs. Anand Sharma & Os. pending in the court of Ms. Rekha, ADJ-North, Rohini Courts, Delhi.

2. The ground for seeking transfer is that the subject matter in all the cases is the same.

3. Learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 6, who has appeared in Caveat, has opposed the transfer on the ground that mere transfer of all the cases will only delay the trial. Learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 6 further submits that in fact the respondent Nos.1, 7 and 8 are allegedly the colluding party.

4. Without going into the merits of the case and taking into account that the subject matter of all the petitions is the same, let suit No.CS-341/21 titled as Amit Sharma vs. Parshu Ram & Ors. pending in the court of Shri Kumar Rahul, Civil Judge, North, Rohini Courts, Delhi and Civil Suit No.719/21 titled as Shri Krishan vs. Parshu Ram & Ors. pending in the court of Shri Shirish Aggarwal, ASCJ (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi be placed before the learned Principal District & Sessions Judge (HQ) Delhi to assign to the Court of competent jurisdiction in the Central District.

5. Similarly, Suit No.CS-239-21 titled as Dharamveer Tyagi vs. Amit Sharma & Ors. pending in the court of Shri Sunil Kumar, ADJ-North, Rohini Court, Delhi and Suit No. CS DJ No.60045/16 titled as Shri Krishan vs. Anand Sharma & Os. pending in the court of Mr. Harish Kumar, ADJ-North, Rohini Courts, Delhi be also placed before the learned Principal District & Sessions Judge (HQ) Delhi to assign to the Court of competent jurisdiction in the Central District.

6. It is clarified that Suit No.341/21 and Civil Suit No.719/21 may be assigned either to the learned Senior Civil Judge or learned Civil Judge as per the directions of the learned Principal District & Sessions Judge (HQ) and Suit No.CS-239-21 and Suit No. CS DJ No.60045/16 be assigned to the Court of learned ADJ as per the directions of learned Principal District & Sessions Judge (HQ).

7. With these observations, writ petition stands disposed of.

8. Parties are directed to appear before the learned Principal District & Sessions Judge (HQ) on 03rd June, 2022. The transferee concerned Court may also be requested to dispose of the matter expeditiously in accordance with law.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top