IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Parshu Ram - Appellant
Versus
Kishan - Respondent
TR.P.(C.) 35 of 2022
Decided On : 30-05-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of petitions and cases involved. (Para 1) |
| 2. grounds for opposing the transfer of cases. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. court's decision on transferring cases. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. final order and directions to the parties. (Para 7 , 8) |
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)
CAV.144/2022
Since learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 6 has entered appearance, the caveat stands discharged.
CM APPL.25904/2022 (exemption)
Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
TR.P.(C.) 35/2022 & CM APPL.25903/2022 (stay)
1. Present petition has been filed seeking transfer of the following cases to one Court:
(i) Suit No.CS-341/21 titled as Amit Sharma vs. Parshu Ram & Ors. pending in the court of Shri Kumar Rahul, Civil Judge, North, Rohini Courts, Delhi.
(ii) Civil Suit No.719/21 titled as Shri Krishan vs. Parshu Ram & Ors. Pending in the court of Shri Shirish Aggarwal, ASCJ (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.
(iii) Suit No.CS-239-21 titled as Dharamveer Tyagi vs. Amit Sharma & Ors. pending in the court of Shri Sunil Kumar, ADJ-North, Rohini Court, Delhi.
(iv) Suit No. CS DJ No.60045/16 titled as Shri Krishan vs. Anand Sharma & Os. pending in the court of Ms. Rekha, ADJ-North, Rohini Courts, Delhi.
2. The ground for seeking transfer is that the subject matter in all the cases is the same.
3. Learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 6, who has appeared in Caveat, has opposed the transfer on the ground that mere transfer of all the cases will only delay the trial. Learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 6 further submits that in fact the respondent Nos.1, 7 and 8 are allegedly the colluding party.
4. Without going into the merits of the case and taking into account that the subject matter of all the petitions is the same, let suit No.CS-341/21 titled as Amit Sharma vs. Parshu Ram & Ors. pending in the court of Shri Kumar Rahul, Civil Judge, North, Rohini Courts, Delhi and Civil Suit No.719/21 titled as Shri Krishan vs. Parshu Ram & Ors. pending in the court of Shri Shirish Aggarwal, ASCJ (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi be placed before the learned Principal District & Sessions Judge (HQ) Delhi to assign to the Court of competent jurisdiction in the Central District.
5. Similarly, Suit No.CS-239-21 titled as Dharamveer Tyagi vs. Amit Sharma & Ors. pending in the court of Shri Sunil Kumar, ADJ-North, Rohini Court, Delhi and Suit No. CS DJ No.60045/16 titled as Shri Krishan vs. Anand Sharma & Os. pending in the court of Mr. Harish Kumar, ADJ-North, Rohini Courts, Delhi be also placed before the learned Principal District & Sessions Judge (HQ) Delhi to assign to the Court of competent jurisdiction in the Central District.
6. It is clarified that Suit No.341/21 and Civil Suit No.719/21 may be assigned either to the learned Senior Civil Judge or learned Civil Judge as per the directions of the learned Principal District & Sessions Judge (HQ) and Suit No.CS-239-21 and Suit No. CS DJ No.60045/16 be assigned to the Court of learned ADJ as per the directions of learned Principal District & Sessions Judge (HQ).
7. With these observations, writ petition stands disposed of.
8. Parties are directed to appear before the learned Principal District & Sessions Judge (HQ) on 03rd June, 2022. The transferee concerned Court may also be requested to dispose of the matter expeditiously in accordance with law.
When multiple cases involve the same subject matter, consolidation is justified to ensure efficient adjudication and prevent conflicting judgments.
Transfer of cases between courts must balance judicial efficiency and avoidance of conflicting judgments, emphasizing the importance of stages in proceedings.
The court may transfer pending civil suits to avoid parallel proceedings and conflicting judgments regarding the same parties and subject matter, as per Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Transfer of suits under Section 24 of the CPC is permissible to ensure consistency and avoid contradictory decisions when the subject matter is similar.
Transfer of suits under Section 24 of CPC requires clear similarity of cause of action or parties; advanced stage of trial weighs against transfer.
The court has authority under Section 24 CPC to transfer cases for the convenience of trial while avoiding inconsistent judgments.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's discretion to transfer suits to avoid conflicting judgments and ensure the interest of justice.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.