IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Sanjeev Narula, J.
Vishnu Todi (Dr.) - Appellant
Versus
All India Institute of Medical Sciences - Respondent
W.P.(C) 1994 of 2022
Decided On : 30-05-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's eligibility for admission is contested. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. contentions about seat allocation rules. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. court analyzes admissions policies and eligibility. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. pgimer's right to determine seat allocation upheld. (Para 19) |
| 5. petition dismissed based on admission criteria. (Para 20) |
JUDGMENT
Sanjeev Narula, J. (Oral)--Petitioner - a Nepalese national, is aggrieved with the denial of admission in M.Ch. (cornea, cataract and refractive surgery) course [hereinafter, "said course"] by Respondent No. 2 - Post Graduate Institute of Medical Research and Education, Chandigarh ["PGIMER"], despite fulfilling the eligibility criteria and being declared as a selected candidate in the entrance test for Institutes of National Importance Super-Speciality ["INI-SS"] conducted by Respondent No. 1 - Examination Section of All India Institute for Medical Sciences ["AIIMS"], pursuant to a Merit List dated 25th December 2021, on the ground that Respondent No. 2 did not have any seats reserved for foreign national candidates. He thus seeks direction to Respondents to grant him admission.
BRIEF FACTS
2. In October, 2021, AIIMS invited applications from eligible candidates, including foreign nationals, for admission to various degree courses, including the said course, for the academic session commencing from January 2022. Pursuant thereto, Petitioner appeared for, and subsequently cleared the INI-SS Examination. On 25th December, 2021, AIIMS released a merit list of provisionally qualified candidates, wherein Petitioner was selected for admission in PGIMER in the said course under the `foreign national' category.
3. It is the case of the Petitioner that pursuant to the result, he made several attempts to contact PGIMER regarding further procedure for admission. By way of an email communication dated 28th December, 2021, he was informed by AIIMS that he need not apply for counselling. Thereafter, as he did not receive any further instructions, aggrieved from the lack of communication regarding his admission, Petitioner approached the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, which, vide order dated 19th January, 2022, directed him to approach the Director of PGIMER, and accordingly, he made a representation dated 20th January, 2022.
4. Thereafter, on 25th January, 2022, by way of an email communication, he was informed by AIIMS that the allocation of seat to him was erroneous and no seat was available to foreign national candidates at PGIMER. The said communication reads as follows:
"From: AIIMS INI-SS
Date: Tue, Jan 25, 2022, 17:05
Subject: Withdrawal of Candidature for M.Ch-Cornea, Cataract & Refractive Surgery at PGIMER, Chandigarh for January-2022 session
To: Vishnu Todi
Cc: DMMCh Section
Dear Candidate,
Attention drawn towards allocation of seat for course M.CH in subject/specialty of Cornea, Cataract and Refractive Surgery Vide result notification 205/2021 dated 25.12.2021.
It is informed that seats under Sponsored and Foreign National category are not interchangeable at PGIMER, Chandigarh and an allocation to you has been made inadvertently. The mistake has been communicated to you by the PGIMER on the day of reporting at the Institute.
In continuation of same it is hereby informed that the said allocation on sponsored seat in M.Ch. Cornea, Cataract and Refractive Surgery stands cancelled as you have applied under Foreign National Category and there is no seat available for Foreign National in the said specialty at PGIMER, Chandigarh.
The inconvenience caused is deeply regretted."
5. Pursuant to AIIMS's communication, PGIMER, vide letter dated 29th January 2021, withdrew the Petitioner's admission, stating that seats under the above-noted categories are not interchangeable at PGIMER, Chandigarh.
6. Assailing the two aforesaid communications as arbitrary and unjust, Petitioner has filed the present writ petition.
CONTENTION
Institutions are not bound by errors made in admission announcements by examination authorities; admissions are governed by institutional policies and procedures.
The court ruled that the failure of AIIMS to clearly communicate eligibility criteria for admission led to unjust denial of admission to meritorious candidates, emphasizing the need for clarity in ac....
The Chandigarh Administration has the authority to impose distinct admission criteria for MBBS and BDS courses for Foreign Indian Students, justifying the exclusion of NRI wards among other provision....
Admission criteria cannot be altered post-publication of eligibility requirements; disqualifications must be explicitly stated in the prospectus.
The court ruled that admissions under the NRI quota must adhere to existing rules, and arbitrary changes post-admission are invalid.
The court ruled that fragmented completion of required residency days at multiple institutions satisfies eligibility, given lack of explicit restrictions in the admission criteria, emphasizing the ne....
Merit and entitlement for seat allocation in educational institutions depend on adherence to procedural norms, alongside validation of certificates; mere claims of wrongdoing by the institution do no....
No legal right vested in the petitioner for allocation of vacant seat, as admission processes are bound by established counseling protocols, reflecting the principle of no fault leading to no prejudi....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.