SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV NARULA
Khundongbam Chetan (Dr.) – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. vacant seat should be allotted if blocked seat becomes available. (Para 1)
2. counseling conducted as per due process for allocation of pg seats. (Para 2 , 3)
3. arguments based on supreme court judgments regarding seat allocation. (Para 4 , 5)
4. petitioner's claim to a vacant seat is not legally supported. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 10)
5. vacancy rules applied in accordance with established guidelines. (Para 9)
6. clarifications on resignation rules and their implications. (Para 11 , 12)
7. court determined no merit in the petitioner's claims. (Para 13 , 14)
8. altering established admission processes creates unwarranted complications. (Para 15)
9. court dismisses petition due to lack of merit. (Para 16)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Narula, J. (Oral)--The Petitioner [Dr. Khundongbam Chetan], a registered medical practitioner has qualified NEET-PG 2021 examination with All India Quota rank of 28858. Aspiring to get admission in the six-year post-MBBS direct DrNB course in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery at Respondent No. 4-Institute [Shija Hospitals & Research Institute Pvt Ltd.], he opted for a seat at Respondent No.4-Institute for the said course in all rounds of counselling but, was t

  • Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top