Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
V.KAMESWAR RAO
Central Board of Trustees (EPFO) – Appellant
Versus
Era Infra Engineering Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of the petition and orders challenged (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. context of the employees provident funds act (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. admission of financial issues and company status (Para 6 , 22) |
| 4. allegations of procedural improprieties (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. responsibility of principal employers (Para 13 , 20) |
| 6. court's authority in reviewing previous orders (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 7. procedural fairness in tribunal hearings (Para 42 , 43 , 44 , 45) |
| 8. need for clarity and identification in compliance matters (Para 46 , 47) |
| 9. final directive on remand to adjudicating authority (Para 92 , 93 , 94 , 95) |
JUDGMENT
V. Kameswar Rao, J. This petition has been filed with the following prayers:
"a. Setting aside the impugned order dated 27th November 2014 passed by Shri R.L. Koli, Ld. Presiding Officer Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, in Appeal i.e. ATA No. 927 (4)2014 "M/s Era Infra Engineering Ltd. V/s RPFC Delhi.
b. Pass any further order/relief as this Hon'ble Court deem fit and proper in favour of the petitioner and against the respondents in the present facts and circumstances of the case."
2. The challenge in the instant petition is to an
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
