SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
Baxter India Pvt. Ltd. Gambro India Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Comm. of Income Tax – Respondent


Table of Content
1. challenge to assessment order and notice. (Para 1)
2. non-existent entity cannot be assessed. (Para 2 , 3)
3. respondents rely on recent supreme court ruling. (Para 4 , 5)
4. jurisdiction issue requires reassessment. (Para 6)
5. writ petition disposed of with directions. (Para 7)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)--Present writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned assessment order dated 31st March, 2022 passed for the Assessment Year 2016-17 under Section 147 read with Sections 144 & 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short `Act') as well as demand notice dated 31st March, 2022 issued under Section 156 imposing a demand of Rs.8,58,76,140/-.

2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that notice has been issued by a non-jurisdictional assessing officer to a non-existent entity. He states that the Respondent No.2 (the then jurisdictional Assessing Officer) was duly intimated much before he wrongfully initiated the impugned reassessment proceedings that Gambro India Private Limited has merged with Petitioner with effect from 01st April, 2015 and therefore stands dissolved. He states that the present case is squarely covered by the decision of the Supreme Cou

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top