IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Sanjeev Narula, J.
Shreya Yadav - Appellant
Versus
National Testing Agency - Respondent
W.P.(C) 9026 of 2022 with W.P.(C) 9165 of 2022
Decided On : 02-06-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners seek pre-emptive measures against omr tampering. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioners claim past tampering of omr sheets warrants current protections. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's previous ruling found insufficient evidence for interim relief. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. incomplete and unsubstantiated allegations lead to dismissal of claims. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. petitions dismissed due to lack of merit and valid cause of action. (Para 13 , 14) |
JUDGMENT
Sanjeev Narula, J. (Oral)--On the basis of a mere apprehension, Petitioners have approached this Court for directions that in their opinion would pre-empt tampering of Optical Mark Recognition ["OMR"] answer sheets in the forthcoming National Eligibility cum Entrance Examination-2022 (Undergraduate) ["NEET"]. The reliefs sought are as follows:
(i) Direct the Respondent 1, 2 & 3 to appropriately secure the image of the OMR answer sheet of Petitioner at Petitioner's exam centre, immediately after completion of the NEET-2022 examination by Petitioner with further direction to transmit the image of the OMR answer sheet to the mobile number (XXXXXXXXX) of parents of Petitioner in presence of Petitioner,
(ii) Direct the filing of the image of NEET-2022 OMR answer sheet of Petitioner in present proceedings through the counsel for respondents, within a day of obtaining such image."
2. As the grounds urged and reliefs sought are identical, a common order is being passed in these two petitions.
Brief Facts:
3. Ms. Shreya Yadav [the sole Petitioner in W.P.(C) 9026/2022], and Ms. Disha Joshi [the sole Petitioner in W.P.(C) 9165/2022] have appeared in previous years' NEET examinations, but were unable to get admission on the basis of their respective scores.
4. The case canvassed by Mr. Ravi Kumar, counsel for Petitioners, is that the Petitioners have been wrongly shown to have secured extremely low marks in the NEET-2020 exam, despite having performed at par with the best candidates across the country in the mock examinations. He alleges that the National Testing Agency ("NTA") [Respondent No. 1 in both the matters], which conducts the NEET examination, has forged and fabricated OMR sheets of the Petitioners in the past, and therefore in the forthcoming NEET-2022, directions should be issued to rule out any possibility of tampering with the OMR sheets. This, he submits can be easily accomplished by way of the directions sought in the petitions. He submits that such directions would cause no prejudice to the Respondents and only aid the Petitioners in proving their case, which has been set forth in writ petitions pertaining to NEET examination conducted in the previous years, which are pending disposal. Mr. Kumar also argues that Petitioners' apprehension is founded on their unfortunate past experience and facts that are in the public domain. He emphasises that it is not uncommon that answer sheets of meritorious students are swapped with other students, and places reliance upon the orders passed in the above-stated writ petitions filed by Petitioners, which are pending disposal. Mr. Kumar fervently argues that Petitioners have no faith in the NTA, and thus protective directions are extremely necessary to secure the image of their respective OMR answer sheets in the forthcoming NEET-2022 examination.
5. He further relies on an order dated 09th December, 2020 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras,1 wherein the Court had made observations raising concerns regarding the issue of manipulation of OMR sheets, which is also being urged before this Court. Thereafter, vide judgment dated 01st March 2021,2 the Court therein had ordered an investigation by the CB-CID and the DIG, CB-CID into the allegations made therein, and the candidate was permitted to sit for counselling, subject to the outcome of the investigation.
6. It is also pointed out that tampering/swapping of OMR sheets also occurred in previous years' NEET examinations, and Petitioners have impugned th
Allegations of examination tampering must be substantiated with credible evidence to establish a legal cause of action for relief.
The unsubstantiated nature of beliefs and lack of evidence are insufficient to establish a valid cause of action in seeking reliefs through a writ petition.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that allegations of forgery/fabrications cannot be inferred without affording an opportunity to the parties to lead evidence, and relief sought can....
Presumption in favor of the official record and the consequences of deliberate tampering with official documents.
The Court held that the original OMR sheet produced by the 2nd respondent was the only one mark sheet of the petitioner and there was no discrepancy in the documents produced by the respondents.
The court's decision emphasized the need for the petitioner to seek redressal through the appropriate forum, declining to entertain the petition under Article 226 of the Constitution.
The submission of forged documents in examination processes can lead to legal action against the candidate, and petitions based on such submissions may be dismissed.
Disputed questions of fact and elaborate evidence required for adjudication under Article 226 of the Constitution.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.