SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV NARULA
Shreya Yadav – Appellant
Versus
National Testing Agency – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Narula, J. (Oral)--On the basis of a mere apprehension, Petitioners have approached this Court for directions that in their opinion would pre-empt tampering of Optical Mark Recognition ["OMR"] answer sheets in the forthcoming National Eligibility cum Entrance Examination-2022 (Undergraduate) ["NEET"]. The reliefs sought are as follows:

    (i) Direct the Respondent 1, 2 & 3 to appropriately secure the image of the OMR answer sheet of Petitioner at Petitioner's exam centre, immediately after completion of the NEET-2022 examination by Petitioner with further direction to transmit the image of the OMR answer sheet to the mobile number (XXXXXXXXX) of parents of Petitioner in presence of Petitioner,

    (ii) Direct the filing of the image of NEET-2022 OMR answer sheet of Petitioner in present proceedings through the counsel for respondents, within a day of obtaining such image."

2. As the grounds urged and reliefs sought are identical, a common order is being passed in these two petitions.

Brief Facts:

3. Ms. Shreya Yadav [the sole Petitioner in W.P.(C) 9026/2022], and Ms. Disha Joshi [the sole Petitioner in W.P.(C) 9165/2022] have appeared in previous years' NEET examinati

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top