SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
JYOTI SINGH
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. details about post-grant patent opposition (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. arguments regarding procedural compliance (Para 7 , 8)
3. court's directions and non-opinion on merits (Para 9 , 10)
4. conclusion and disposal of petitions (Para 11)

JUDGMENT

Jyoti Singh, J. (Oral)

1. W.P.(C)-IPD 14/2022 has been filed seeking directions to Respondents No.2 and 3 to fix Petitioner's post-grant opposition, filed against Respondent No.4/Novo Nordisk A/S (patentee), with respect to patent No. IN 257402, for hearing under Rule 62(1) of the Patent Rules, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as `Rules') and adjudicate the same at the earliest, in accordance with law.

2. Patentee had filed a patent application bearing No. 2771/DELNP/2006, which was granted on 04.10.2013 and the Petitioner, through its predecessor-in-interest, filed a post-grant opposition on 29.09.2014, under Section 25(2) of the Patents Act (hereinafter referred to as `Act') against the impugned patent. On 27.08.2019, Recommendation of the Opposition Board was communicated to the parties and a hearing was scheduled under Rule 62(1) of the Rules. However, the proceedings did not progress for one reason or the other, co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top