Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
JYOTI SINGH
Best Agrolife Limited – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Controller of Patents – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition for quashing patent grant (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments against patent grant process (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. respondent arguments on petition maintainability (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. court observations on principles of natural justice (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. assessment of submitted evidence by respondent (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 6. discussion on writ jurisdiction and remedies (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 7. analysis of respondent's reasoning in patent grant (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 8. requirements for enhanced efficacy under section 3(d) (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 9. remand instructions and non-consideration of arguments (Para 41 , 42) |
| 10. conclusion on amendment validity and procedural compliance (Para 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49) |
| 11. final remediation orders from the court (Para 50 , 51 , 52 , 53) |
| 12. judgment disposition and order (Para 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58) |
JUDGMENT
Jyoti Singh, J. Present writ petition has been preferred by the Petitioner seeking quashing of the order dated 08.04.2022, passed by Respondent No. 1/Deputy Controller of Patents and Designs, dismissing the pre-grant opposition and allowing the grant
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
