SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
Yogesh Jagia – Appellant
Versus
Jindl Biochem Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Table of Content
1. factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
2. petitioner's arguments against the complaint. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
3. respondent's arguments supporting the complaint. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)
4. court's analysis of the case. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36)
5. conclusion quashing the complaint. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40)

JUDGMENT

Chandra Dhari Singh, J.

1. The instant petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter "Cr.P.C.") has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking following prayer:

    "(i) Pass an order allowing present petition and quashing the summoning order dated 27.11.2013, qua the petitioner, issued in complaint case No. 149/1/12 by Ms Purva Sareen, Metropolitan Magistrate-01/south/Saket Court, New Delhi..."

FACTUAL MATRIX

The Brief facts of the case leading to the filing of instant petition are as follows:

2. The Petitioner is a practicing Advocate enrolled with Bar Council of Delhi since 1991 and the Respondent/Complainant is a real estate development company.

3. In 2005, four promoters of complainant company, namely, Rajin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top