SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Jyoti Singh, J.
Phenomenon Agents Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Powereye Electronics - Respondent
CM(M) 599 of 2022
Decided On : 15-06-2022




The court emphasized that adjournments in trademark disputes should not impede timely resolution and encouraged swift proceedings without prejudicing the merits of the case.

Headnote:(A) Trademark Act - Regulation of hearings and adjournments - The court addressed an application impugning the trial court's order regarding the adjournment of a trademark matter for further consideration - No adjudication on rights occurred; hence, no interference warranted - Court instructed trial court to prioritize the case. (Paras 7-9)

(B) Civil Procedure Code - Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 - Parties sought interim injunction and appointment of a Local Commissioner - Court acknowledges urgency and requests faster progression of the trial court's hearing while refraining from commenting on case merits. (Paras 10-12)

Table of Content
1. exemption applications allowed. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. impugned order concerns adjournment. (Para 7)
3. court's direction to trial for early consideration. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
4. petition disposal with applications. (Para 13)

JUDGMENT

Jyoti Singh, J. (ORAL)

CM APPL. 28421/2022 (exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application stands disposed of.

CM APPL. 28422/2022 (exemption from service to Respondents)

3. Since there is an urgency in the matter and the matter is being heard today, Petitioners are exempted from serving advance notice on Respondents.

4. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and disposed of.

CM APPL. 28423/2022 (exemption)

5. Subject to the Petitioners filing certified, clearer and translated copies, which it may seek to place reliance on, within four weeks from today, exemption is granted.

6. Application is allowed and disposed of.

CM(M) 599/2022 & CM APPL. 28424-25/2022

7. Present petition impugns the order dated 07.06.2022, which for ready reference is extracted hereunder:

    "Fresh suit under Trademark and Copyright Act for permanent injunction and passing off etc. was received on 04.06.2022 when presiding officer was on training and hence the matter was adjourned for today. It be checked and registered.

    Put up for consideration of all applications on 27.07.2022."

8. This Court does not find any reason to interfere in the order as the Trial Court has not adjudicated upon the rights of the parties and has only adjourned the matter for consideration on 27.07.2022.

9. No interference is called for in the impugned order.

10. At this stage, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners submits that it would suffice if the Trial Court is directed to take up the matter at an early date, since Petitioners have filed applications under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC seeking interim injunction and appointment of a Local Commissioner.

11. The Court finds merit in this submission of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners and accordingly, the Trial Court is requested to take up the matter on 04.07.2022, for consideration.

12. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.

13. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of along with pending applications.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top