Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SHAKDHER, TALWANT SINGH
Govt. of NCT of Delhi – Appellant
Versus
K.K. Prasad (Dr.) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to orders and historical context. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. aicte regulations on recruitment and qualifications. (Para 4 , 5 , 8 , 11) |
| 3. procedural directions from cat. (Para 6 , 7 , 10) |
| 4. delay and non-compliance by petitioners. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 5. grounds for the cat's allowance of oa. (Para 14 , 18 , 19) |
| 6. discussion of aicte directions and binding nature. (Para 15 , 22 , 25 , 26) |
| 7. arguments on discretion and claims of expectation. (Para 17 , 24 , 49) |
| 8. impact of changes in aicte regulations on the promotion. (Para 38 , 39 , 41) |
| 9. conclusion on the basis for judicial review. (Para 40 , 48) |
| 10. final ruling on writ petition. (Para 51) |
JUDGMENT
Talwant Singh, J. The petitioners have filed the present writ petition challenging the impugned judgment dated 06.11.2019 in OA 1214/2016 and order dated 21.10.2020 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi in CP No. 95/2020.
2. It has been prayed that these orders are perverse and the same may be quashed. The brief history, as per the petitioners is that the respondent no.1 i.e., Mr K.K. Prasad was appointed as a Lecturer (Mathematics) in the year 1995. There were no recruitment rul
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
