SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manoj Kumar Ohri, J.
Raisen Marketing Pvt. Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Municipal Corporation of Delhi - Respondent
W.P.(C) 9746 of 2022 and CM Appl. 28915 of 2022
Decided On : 04-07-2022




The court affirmed the necessity for administrative bodies to accommodate lawful business operations upon receipt of relevant permissions, balancing enforcement with procedural fairness.

Headnote:(A) Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 343 and 344(1) - Petition for temporary de-sealing of property for shifting of stock - Petitioner granted licenses for retail sale of liquor and received a show cause notice for unauthorized construction - Respondents agreed to temporary de-sealing to allow stock transfer. (Paras 1-6)

(B) Mandamus - Prerogative writ for implementing effective administrative procedures - Upon the Excise Department granting permission, the respondents exhibited willingness to cooperate with the petitioner's request. (Paras 5-6)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, operating a liquor vend under respective licenses at a sealed property, sought a writ to temporarily de-seal the property for a stock transfer approved by the Excise Department following unauthorized construction allegations.

Findings of Court:
The court allowed the temporary de-sealing of the property to facilitate the removal of stock due to the permissions already granted by the Excise Department, outlining a specified timeline for the process.

Issues: The principal issue concerned the petitioner's request for temporary de-sealing of a property to shift stock after a sealing order due to alleged unauthorized construction.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for administrative cooperation in compliance with statutory permissions, indicating that procedural obstacles should not impede lawful business operations.

Result: Writ petition disposed of with directions.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks temporary de-sealing of property. (Para 1)
2. petitioner holds liquor licenses for the property. (Para 2)
3. approval for shifting of stock granted. (Para 3)
4. respondents consent to temporary de-sealing. (Para 4 , 5)
5. court orders temporary de-sealing and disposes of petition. (Para 6 , 7)

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Ohri, J. (ORAL)

1. By way of the present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought the following reliefs:

"a. Pass a writ of Mandamus or a similar direction against the Respondents to allow temporary de-sealing of the property bearing number D-73, Ground Floor, Malviya Nagar, New Delhi - 110017 for a period of three (3) days allowing the petitioner to shift/remove its existing stock to A-3/15, Asaf Ali Road, Ground Floor, Delhi - 110002 for which excise permission has been granted vide Order dated 08.06.2022 passed by the Department of Excise, Govt. of NCT of Delhi;

b. Pass a writ of Mandamus or a similar direction against the Respondents to allow the Petitioner to remove its stock stored at the property number D-73, Ground Floor, Malviya Nagar, New Delhi - 110017 from the said property."

2. Mr. Ramesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner was granted L-7Z Zonal licence for Retail sale of Indian and foreign liquor (excluding country liquor) in the NCT of Delhi on 18.08.2021, which was valid upto 31.03.2022. Thereafter, on 16.11.2021, it obtained an L-7V license to operate liquor vend at property bearing No.D-73, GF, Malviya Nagar, Delhi (hereinafter, referred to as the `subject property'), where it is a tenant.

During the course of operation of its liquor vend, the petitioner received a Show Cause Notice dated 29.11.2021 from the respondents under Sections 343 and 344(1) of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957, alleging unauthorized construction at the subject property in the shape of excess coverage in deviation against the sanctioned building plan at ground, first and second floors including covering front set back at ground level (old and occupied). Subsequently, the property was sealed on 31.03.2022.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that vide order dated 08.06.2022, the Deputy Commissioner (Excise-I)/Licensing Authority has approved the petitioner's request for shifting of stock from the subject property to property bearing No.A-3/15, Asaf Ali Road, Ground Floor, Delhi - 110002. A copy of the said order has been annexed to the present petition as Annexure 10.

Learned counsel has prayed that in case the subject property is temporarily de-sealed by the respondent/Corporation, the petitioner would be able to shift the stock lying therein to the newly allotted premises. He also prays that since the quantity of inventories lying at the subject property is large and the license of the petitioner is due to expire on 31.07.2022, sufficient time may be granted to shift the stock/inventories.

4. Issue notice.

5. Ms. Monika Arora, learned counsel for the respondents, accepts notice and, on instructions, submits that since the requisite permission has already been granted to the petitioner by the Excise Department, the answering respondents have no objection to the request made.

6. Accordingly, with the consent of the parties, it is directed that the subject property be temporarily de-sealed by the respondents on 11.07.2022 at 11:00 a.m. and re-sealed thereafter on 13.07.2022 at 04:00 p.m.

7. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Miscellaneous application is disposed of as infructuous.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top