SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Raisen Marketing Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Corporation of Delhi – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks temporary de-sealing of property. (Para 1)
2. petitioner holds liquor licenses for the property. (Para 2)
3. approval for shifting of stock granted. (Para 3)
4. respondents consent to temporary de-sealing. (Para 4 , 5)
5. court orders temporary de-sealing and disposes of petition. (Para 6 , 7)

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Ohri, J. (ORAL)

1. By way of the present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought the following reliefs:

    "a. Pass a writ of Mandamus or a similar direction against the Respondents to allow temporary de-sealing of the property bearing number D-73, Ground Floor, Malviya Nagar, New Delhi - 110017 for a period of three (3) days allowing the petitioner to shift/remove its existing stock to A-3/15, Asaf Ali Road, Ground Floor, Delhi - 110002 for which excise permission has been granted vide Order dated 08.06.2022 passed by the Department of Excise, Govt. of NCT of Delhi;

    b. Pass a writ of Mandamus or a similar direction against the Respondents to allow the Petitioner to remove its stock stored at the property number D-73, Ground Floor, Malviya Nagar, New Delhi - 110017 from the said property."

2.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top